- Joined
- Oct 27, 2011
- Messages
- 101,812
- Reaction score
- 45,409
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
This is utter nonsense.Globalism has benefited the middle and upper classes in this country tremendously and has been a major source of its economic growth. If globalization is halted, and more nationalist policies are pursued like bringing back manufacturing jobs, the entire US economy would be absolutely devastated.
Globalism moved manufacturing jobs OUT of the US. Who benefited? The middle and upper class who lost their jobs? I don't think so. Likewise, when manufacturing makes a comeback in the US, the economy surges because there are more good paying jobs for more of the middle and upper classes.
You seem to be employing "1984" groupthink. You may convince some useful idiots, but it won't work with me.
Who says manufacturing jobs are "low skilled"?It is true, however, the non-college educated, low-skilled folks like the Trump base has been hurt by this. I’m not saying this in a pejorative way. They really have been hurt by this loss of manufacturing and other low- skilled jobs, and it’s understandable why they would hate it so much.
So what to do about all this?
Just like most such issues, the answers are of course not easy or simple. But the hard truth is that the United States economy does not need low skilled jobs anymore. It can much more efficiently outsource those jobs. It needs an educated, highly skilled workforce. That’s why Hillary Clinton’s plan in 2016 was to help America make that transition. But the Trump base, which prides itself so much on being hard-working, refused, because I guess retraining would be too hard to do. They may be hard-working, but not THAT hard-working. They want to keep sticking with their low skilled jobs and obsolete technologies like coal. But is that really what’s good for the nation in the long run? Do you really think that’s the approach that will keep the American economy competitive in this new world and “make America great again”?