- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,009
- Reaction score
- 33,944
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
To be fair, in the case of the Neanderthals we're not exactly talking about the actions of an existing political entity. From what I gather, North America's eastern regions had been thoroughly settled by the British and French, and much of the south and west by the Spanish, before the United States became a nation; but that country which still exists today did participate in the tail end of the native American genocide in the westward expansion of the 19th century. It was Matchlight who brought up apologizing, but like I said no individual could be expected to apologize for deeds they hadn't done, and nor should any countries or institutions be expected to apologize for anything they had not done. Personally I don't know and scarcely care if the US has acknowledged or apologized on that front - mere words are only a first step in addressing some of the issues endemic to indigenous communities in both of our countries, after all - but as far as our little forum goes I reckon it's worth discussing as a matter of historical fact and not trivialized as "well others did it too!" or (even worse) by suggestions that the land was unoccupied/unowned.
Competition often produces great results, and sometimes even war - the harshest competition of all - leads to advances and long term benefits. But does that mean war is a good thing? Does it mean that genocide is a good thing?
History isn't black and white, and a handful of fringe lunatics aside no-one claims that America (or other colonial or post-colonial powers) is some kind of utterly evil empire; nor that indigenous populations were peaceful angels living in complete harmony with nature. But as evidenced by this very thread, some people are unwilling even to come to terms with the fact that invasion, conquest, direct mass killing and indirect consequences of these policies resulting in near-extermination of two continents' populations is in fact genocide.
There is no question that the European exploration and exploitation of the new world resulted in the deaths of a large percentage of the native Americans. The term "genocide" could certainly be applied to the demise of the natives.
But, history is what it is, and, as you said, requires no apology. The modern nations of North America would not exist had that "genocide" not taken place. The best we can do when it comes to history is study it objectively and learn from it.
Rousseau and his "noble savage" idea was debunked centuries ago, and yet, we still have people re writing history to lament the evil Europeans and their guns destroying an idyllic and peaceful people for financial gain. I think we can agree that is bunk.
Guns, germs, and steel wiped out a large percentage of the native Americans. The invaders had superior weapons and better resistance to diseases that they brought with them. The same scenario has been played out throughout human history, and just might be played out again. History repeats itself.