- Joined
- Nov 14, 2021
- Messages
- 2,847
- Reaction score
- 1,353
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Other
You cannot even read what you posted. Hillary in the loop would fit a pattern, hence not nonsense. If that was not clear enough, there is a restatement in my next post that cannot be misconstrued as you wish to do.
No evidence whatsoever, including in Durham’s report, indicates that HRC had any involvement in any illegal surveillance, and certainly not dating back to 2014.You cannot even read what you posted. Hillary in the loop would fit a pattern, hence not nonsense.
Klutz work there. You stand rebuked.
Why do you keep bringing up Durham's report? You're the only one interested in it.No evidence whatsoever, including in Durham’s report, indicates that HRC had any involvement in any illegal surveillance, and certainly not dating back to 2014.
Try not failing for once.
As far as I can tell, there is no other investigation into Clinton's campaign or anything else that happened in '15 & '16. The Durham thing is all you got left and there's not much to that.Why do you keep bringing up Durham's report? You're the only one interested in it.
Your try at not failing fell short.
As far as I can tell, there is no other investigation into Clinton's campaign or anything else that happened in '15 & '16. The Durham thing is all you got left and there's not much to that.
That's true about the Clinton campaign. Durham is about what happened from 2015 onward.As far as I can tell, there is no other investigation into Clinton's campaign or anything else that happened in '15 & '16.
It's not mine; it's everyone's. After all, Durham is a US Attorney who represents the whole country. You only assume it's partisan because that is your own practice.The Durham thing is all you got left and there's not much to that.
Because no other completed investigation has indicated that HRC did anything illegal during the 2016 campaign, and because Durham’s investigation is the only ongoing investigation into the 2016 campaign, which so far has also not indicated any illegal activity on HRC’s part.Why do you keep bringing up Durham's report?
Another @Jay59 whopper!You're the only one interested in it.
100% wrong.it has been established that the FBI illegally wiretapped the POTUS based on purposefully and incorrectly edited evidence.
Including you, apparently.…. those who do not want to now the truth.
Now you are insisting on an investigation. The goal posts move once again.Because no other completed investigation has indicated that HRC did anything illegal during the 2016 campaign, and because Durham’s investigation is the only ongoing investigation into the 2016 campaign, which so far has also not indicated any illegal activity on HRC’s part.
Another @Jay59 whopper!
It's probably good that I am not a Trumpster. I'm just a fan of his work.Virtually every Trumpster member in this forum has been anxiously awaiting Durham’s indictments against HRC, predicting that she, along with others, would soon be wearing orange jumpsuits.
Nice intro. It describes your post very well.100% wrong.
Nice rant. Too bad your reading skills failed you because it's not on point.“The Opening of Crossfire Hurricane and Four Related Investigations, and Early Investigative Steps The Opening of Crossfire Hurricane and Four Individual Cases
As we describe in Chapter Three, the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, just days after its receipt of information from a Friendly Foreign Government (FFG) reporting that, in May 2016, during a meeting with the FFG, then Trump campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos "suggested the Trump team had received some kind of suggestion from Russia that it could assist this process with the anonymous release of information during the campaign that would be damaging to Mrs. Clinton (and President Obama)." The FBI Electronic Communication (EC) opening the Crossfire Hurricane investigation stated that, based on the FFG information, "this investigation
is being opened to determine whether individual(s) associated with the Trump campaign are witting of and/or coordinating activities with the Government of Russia." We did not find information in FBI or Department ECs, emails, or other documents, or through witness testimony, indicating that any information other than the FFG information was relied upon to predicate the opening of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Although not mentioned in the EC, at the time, FBI officials involved in opening the investigation had reason to believe that Russia may have been connected to the Wikileaks disclosures that occurred earlier in July 2016, and were aware of information regarding Russia's efforts to interfere with the 2016
U.S. elections. These officials, though, did not become aware of Steele's election reporting until weeks later and we therefore determined that Steele's reports played no role in the Crossfire Hurricane opening.
Your projection is still going strong.Including you, apparently.
Lie.Now you are insisting on an investigation. The goal posts move once again.
That makes you a Trumpster.It's probably good that I am not a Trumpster. I'm just a fan of his work.
Standard @Jay59 “juke and evasion”.Nice intro. It describes your post very well.
Nice rant. Too bad your reading skills failed you because it's not on point.
Your projection is still going strong.
Juke and evasion, again.Lie.
Only to a cultist. The cult hates Trump for no reason. Rational people look at the facts, something you are avoiding.That makes you a Trumpster.
Returning to the point is not an evasion. Look it up.Standard @Jay59 “juke and evasion”.
Rational people have no use for Trump, for many good reasons.The cult hates Trump for no reason.
Your view of Trump is anything but rational. Or supportable.Rational people look at the facts,
Cultists have no use for Trump. Rational people actually check see what is what.Rational people have no use for Trump, for many good reasons.
In the sense, that's true. I don't use any alt-facts to make it comfortable for you.Your view of Trump is anything but rational. Or supportable.
Gobbledygook.Cultists have no use for Trump. Rational people actually check see what is what.
“Alt-facts” is all you your kind spouts.In the sense, that's true. I don't use any alt-facts to make it comfortable for you.
All we ever hear from GOPers is, when someone is indicted, let us know. Well the same applies to the Clinton campaign and the FBI and anyone else who MAY have been involved in alleged crimes. When the indictments are unsealed, let us know.it has been established that the FBI illegally wiretapped the POTUS based on purposefully and incorrectly edited evidence. they have not pursued this any further because the Bureaucracy in Washington are the ones responsible.
trying to hide that under a rug is not going to win your side anything come November. THEN perhaps we will get the investigation we need into this miscreant government by congress.
We KNOW the entire investigation was started due to a sham, and thus was a sham itself.
and you probably think that whole sham started and ended basically by accident with one clerk in the FBI. That's a load of BS for gullible people, or those who do not want to now the truth.
Spying on a guy who has known questionable ties to Russians and is working on the Trump campaign. Right or wrong, I can certainly understand why they did it.That's true about the Clinton campaign. Durham is about what happened from 2015 onward.
It's not mine; it's everyone's. After all, Durham is a US Attorney who represents the whole country. You only assume it's partisan because that is your own practice.
The Durham investigation is merely the most recent. Spying was established years ago, with the discovery of the fraudulent FISA application.
You make a case for law enforcement committing felonies against American citizens. Nixon was thrown out of office for a much smaller case of the same thing.Spying on a guy who has known questionable ties to Russians and is working on the Trump campaign. Right or wrong, I can certainly understand why they did it.