- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 8,713
- Reaction score
- 1,907
- Location
- The Derby City
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Actually the problem is like any forecast it gives trends not hard data. No computer model can tell you what the high will be for April 13, 2016. One fact about 'global warning' is it sets a see saw pattern in motion.
The best example is a pot of water on the stove. As it gets hot and just starts to simmer if you add some cold water, to mimic the ice packs melting, the simmer is stopped. but the stove is still on and soon the simmer starts again and again you add cold water to mimic more of the ice pack melting. Now once you run out of ice pack there is nothing to stop the simmer and then it is up and popping!
So on the planet the hot zone that spawns hurricanes is being hit periodically with an increase of much colder Artic waters. The observable result to the casual observer is 'Where's the global warning?' but to scientists they see that once the ice pack is whittled down to a sliver of it's former size the regulator of the ocean temps will be gone.
So instead of calling it Global Warming the better tag is Climate Change.
I'm wondering how do Alex Jones and these people who don't believe all human activity added together can't effect average climate over many years, believe that Obama can change the weather?
Just having a little self consistency once in a while would have been nice.
I've been keeping a close watch on these wackos. Though, I'm sure the storm did distract the news media from covering the scandals. I bet they've moved on to "more important things."
The thing that makes it obvious is that they only pull it out of their conspiracy Rolodex when the event is breaking news and popular in the regular people stream and has a devastating effect upon humans in general. Besides that, it is about HAARP, and other so-called weather related events that fit what I said above that they think the government staged. The thing is, if the government has such a device that can create and modify weather to the variables they choose, why wouldn't they be using it to their advantage, like against the drought, and why is its use only perceived as a negative in the mind of some conspiracy theorists? As well, the big question, "Where's the evidence?"
But that's not how it really happened, is it? It is called Climate Change because like the word "liberal", the word "Global Warming" was successfully smeared by right wing groups and as usual leftists acquiesced. Once you average over short term temperature trends (over one or a number of years) you'll get an upward temperature trend, hence the name global warming.
Climate Change, while being a correct term to describe this phenomena, carries less information than the more scientifically precise term "global warming".
That's hilarious. I'm sure you have some scientific sources for this "theory" of yours, right??
Google the great ocean conveyor belt.eace
Don't have to. Been familiar with that theory for many years. I don't think you really understand it based on your flawed interpretation.
IF you are familiar with it you'd know it isn't a theory, the conveyor exists and has been plotted from the arctic circle to the West Coast of Africa, to the Gulf and then up toward England. Several factors influence it, adding more cold fresh water dampens the hurricane generator.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?