• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Yellen Urges Marshall Plan for Ukraine to Meet Massive Need

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
111,083
Reaction score
101,340
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Yellen Urges Marshall Plan for Ukraine to Meet Massive Need




It has been 60 years since a US ally (South Korea) has been as devastated by war.
 
She's right. The means to have Russia pay for this have to be found. The lesson has to be that if you invade another country there's going to be no economic benefit derived from the action.
 
Did Yellen advocate a corporate "death tax" on US "defense" contractors to counter the destruction of the US proxy war in Ukraine?

https://news.cgtn.com/news/2022-04-...antly-sending-weapons--19vV80rnhSM/index.html

"By passing the lend-lease act, the U.S. seems to have decided to continuously add fuel to the fire.

"As The American Conservative magazine puts, the U.S is trying to prolong the war 'to the last Ukrainian.'

"But as the world's arsenal, the U.S. is profiteering and remains well positioned to reap even more after the conflict."
 
She's right. The means to have Russia pay for this have to be found. The lesson has to be that if you invade another country there's going to be no economic benefit derived from the action.
What's the market like for super-yachts these days? Good? bad?
 
Russia's forces are getiing their asses kicked.
Or you are being lied to.
According to some accounts, Ukraine's Donbass defenses are slowly collapsing:


https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/russia-ukraine-war-may-19/liveblog/91652854.cms

Russian shelling of the eastern Ukraine city of Severodonetsk left at least 12 people dead and another 40 injured, the region's governor Sergei Gaiday said on Thursday, as Moscow' army continued its slow push into Donbas
 
While Russia may gain in Donbas, they lose in Kharkiv. Ukraine forces are a spit's distance from the Russian border
 
While Russia may gain in Donbas, they lose in Kharkiv. Ukraine forces are a spit's distance from the Russian border


Defeating the Russian Army in the Donbass has to be the goal of the Ukrainian Army.
 
While Russia may gain in Donbas, they lose in Kharkiv. Ukraine forces are a spit's distance from the Russian border
The reports I'm hearing this morning claim Ukrainian forces are being pushed back from Russia's border. Capturing Donbass and the land corridor seems like Putin's goal which, from a Russian standpoint, could result in Ukraine disintegrating into several states with the blame falling on Ukrainian and Western hatred of Russia.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56720589
 
Defeating the Russian Army in the Donbass has to be the goal of the Ukrainian Army.
The next Ukrainian focus will probably be in the South, not Donbas. Retaking Kherson is a must, would be a symbolic victory for Ukraine, and a symbolic defeat for Russia, which would influence morale of both armies. Furthermore the Russian defences in Kherson are not as entrenched as in Donbas, but a Ukrainian push in the south would force Russia to move troops from Donbas to the south.
 
You're using a map from May 8th!
 
Defeating the Russian Army in the Donbass has to be the goal of the Ukrainian Army.
In time. With the help of NATO weapons, they will do just that.
 
Defeating the Russian Army in the Donbass has to be the goal of the Ukrainian Army.



The point is the primary goal of an Army in the field is taking out the opposing Army, not capturing territories. It goes without saying that once the opposing Army is taken out the territories are there to be picked up. That goes for both Russia and Ukraine.

There is a Russian Army in Kherson. Obviously Russia wants to keep it. And as equally obbvious the Russians will accept a challenge. So it makes sense for Ukraine to attack there. And it may force Russia to move troops from Donbass to Kherson.

I was addressing the case of Donbass and Ukraine mounting an offensive in Kharkiv. I see merits for that offensive if it is to push the Russians beyond artillery range of Kharkiv. But that was not the goal as given to media. The media suggested grandiose goals that have to be beyond the abilities of the Ukrainian Army in Kharkiv. A big offensive over a huge distance to cut off rail lines from Belgorod to the Donbass. My impression is that tha is way beyond the abilities of Ukraine's Kharkiv garrison. The Russian General in command in Donbass will just ignore it. The Kharkiv Ukrainian Army will just spend itself without aiding the beseiged Ukrainian garrisons in Donbass in any way
 
You're using a map from May 8th
Kharkiv is the same (spitting) distance from Russia today as it was on May 8th.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60506682

"Russian forces are continuing their slow advance in the east of the country after using heavy firepower to weaken Ukraine's defences.
Here are the latest developments:
  • Bombardment of Donbas region by Russia forces is intensifying
  • Russian troops withdrawn from Kharkiv redeployed in Donetsk
  • Russia preparing offensive to take key city of Severodonetsk
  • Ongoing build-up of Russian navy around Snake Island"
How many more Ukrainians have to die for regime change in Russia?
 

Ukrainians are at the Russian border northeast of Kharkiv.
 

Last time I checked Ukrainians were fighting for Ukraine.
 
Don't foist your comprehension problems on others.
A Just Peace ( as opposed to a Just War) approach to ending military operations in Ukraine begins with identifying the root causes of the conflict as well as the genuine needs of the adversaries.

Do you comprehend U$ responsibility for creating this proxy conflict and the motive$ behind it?


https://www.americamagazine.org/pol.../22/just-peace-approach-ukraine-russia-242441

"Acknowledgement of responsibility. The United States could publicly acknowledge the role it played by interfering, via financial and public support to opposition candidates, in the Ukrainian elections in 2014 (just as we would object if Russia supported an anti-U.S. candidate in a Mexican election) and now by supplying weapons to that government.

"This would give NATO the moral authority to invite Russia to acknowledge responsibility for their harm in supplying weapons and troops to partisans in eastern Ukraine and also interfering in elections.

"The parties could explore processes for accountability through restorative justice mechanisms."
 
Last time I checked Ukrainians were fighting for Ukraine.
Last time you checked, how many Russian-speaking Ukrainians have been raped, murdered, maimed, and/or displaced by neo-Nazi Ukrainians since 2014?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…