- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,009
- Reaction score
- 33,943
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
LOL! Where on Earth are you getting your information?1 It is not an unsupported opinion, but actual fact that is part of the congressional record. Obama in particular spent billions on Africa as part of his Marxist redistribution of wealth ideology.
Front Page Featured | MRCTV
www.cnsnews.com
Furthermore, Obama had the EPA deliberately lie and violate the law by creating an "Endangerment Finding" in 2009 to get around the Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, 549 U.S. 497 (2007) and illegally giving the EPA more authority that they were ever intended to have.
2 Yet another leftist lie, as usual. I just demonstrated you are wrong with peer-reviewed studies. What do you have that supports your ludicrous claim? A list of scientific organizations world wide won't cut it, you have to actually provide evidence to support your claim (like I have), or have it dismissed as just more leftist bullshit.
3 I'm not surprised that you are incapable of comprehending my posts. It speaks volumes about your lack of education.
I never said that CO2 increases 800 years ago was causing temperatures to increase today. I said exactly the opposite. Do try to pay closer attention.
4 I said, repeatedly, that an INCREASE IN TEMPERATURE 800 YEARS AGO is resulting in an INCREASE IN CO2 TODAY. There is an 800 year lag between an increase in temperature and an increase in CO2, as every one of those peer-reviewed papers I posted said, and that is the scientific consensus. Not your fictional bullshit about humans being the cause, for which there is absolutely no evidence.
1 There's just a slight difference between 750 million and "trillions." Sure, some money is going to have to be spent on global warming. If we just ignore the situation, it will wind up costing a lot more.
2 Every scientific organization on Earth says the same thing.
3 When in doubt, when there is no logical response, simply insult.
4 Oh, I see I did get your ludicrous claim backwards. The claim is not that CO2 emissions 800 years ago resulted in global warming today, but that global warming 800 years ago are resulting in CO2 emissions today.
Then, your claim is that the increase in carbon dioxide today is due to a warming trend 800 years ago, is that really what you're attempting to claim?
Please cite the real scientific organization that supports that absurd claim.