• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would you want to be paid according to your needs?

Robertinfremont

Photo of me taken in the Army 1963
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
30,122
Reaction score
3,395
Location
Meridian, Idaho
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
What famous dead man said earn per your needs?

Would you want to work for a firm that paid you per your needs?

What would you do? Increase your needs? Working harder would not work since there is no added pay for hard work, smarter work, and in general anti Union systems.

A union does not bargain for harder work or smarter work, they treat all as one.

Anyway, get the complete idea from this film.

 
What famous dead man said earn per your needs?

Would you want to work for a firm that paid you per your needs?

What would you do? Increase your needs? Working harder would not work since there is no added pay for hard work, smarter work, and in general anti Union systems.

A union does not bargain for harder work or smarter work, they treat all as one.

Anyway, get the complete idea from this film.



Atlas Shrugged?
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs."
-John Rogers-
 
What famous dead man said earn per your needs?

Would you want to work for a firm that paid you per your needs?

What would you do? Increase your needs? Working harder would not work since there is no added pay for hard work, smarter work, and in general anti Union systems.

A union does not bargain for harder work or smarter work, they treat all as one.

Anyway, get the complete idea from this film.

Absolutely not. Generally the "needs" of slaves were met.
 
It's impossible to know what someone's needs are. And it's also impossible to know what someone's abilities are.

And the labor theory of value is also stupid. Why have so many taken Marx seriously?
 
What famous dead man said earn per your needs?

Would you want to work for a firm that paid you per your needs?

What would you do? Increase your needs? Working harder would not work since there is no added pay for hard work, smarter work, and in general anti Union systems.

A union does not bargain for harder work or smarter work, they treat all as one.

Anyway, get the complete idea from this film.



Stupid. humans still strive for position. Money is not the only perq.
 
It's impossible to know what someone's needs are. And it's also impossible to know what someone's abilities are.

And the labor theory of value is also stupid. Why have so many taken Marx seriously?

Long, long ago I literally did live struggling for needs. But that is long past. Now I pursue desires. It is no longer what I need, but how much of what I want can I obtain - economically and otherwise. It's been that way for a long time. Quite successful at it too.
 
It's impossible to know what someone's needs are. And it's also impossible to know what someone's abilities are.

And the labor theory of value is also stupid. Why have so many taken Marx seriously?

Always remember no matter what humans enjoy making money as some of the greedy so eloquently demonstrate. 99.99% of the greedy did not get there on their own
or without a team of very hard workers.
 
It's easy and requires only the intellect to believe stupid things.

It's impossible to know what someone's needs are. And it's also impossible to know what someone's abilities are.

And the labor theory of value is also stupid. Why have so many taken Marx seriously?
 
True greed is wanting someone else's money.


Always remember no matter what humans enjoy making money as some of the greedy so eloquently demonstrate. 99.99% of the greedy did not get there on their own
or without a team of very hard workers.
 
For all readers.

Objectivism, a system of philosophy created by Ayn Rand, has four main principles: objective reality, absolute reason, individualism, and laissez-faire capitalism. Here's what those mean.

The concept of objective reality is where Objectivism gets its name, and it's the trickiest of the concepts to grasp. Basically, it means that outside our own personal perceptions, there is one true reality happening. Objectively, there are things going on in the world whether or not a person is there to see them. Objectivism's answer to 'if a tree falls in the forest and nobody's around to hear it, does it make a sound?' is a firm yes.

Furthermore, for Objectivists, the only way we know that we exist is in relation to that reality. We don't have a separate consciousness or soul--a person's existence is defined by the capacity to observe reality. It's heavy stuff.

Tied into the idea of objective reality is the Objectivist love for absolute reason. There's no room in Objectivism for emotions or faith. In any given situation, the facts -- again, based on objective reality -- are the only thing that should guide people, according to Ayn Rand.

That idea ties further into the belief in Objectivism that the individual should be empowered above everything else, or individualism. A man who's able to embrace the logic and reason of an objective reality is the most powerful figure in the Objectivist worldview. And if a man is able to do that, he should only ever act in his own self-interest. Remember, there's no room in Objectivism for emotions, faith, or any higher power at all. The whole system of morality in Objectivism is guided by the question of 'Will this make me happy?'

All of that leads into the embrace of laissez-faire capitalism, an economic system where the economy is completely unregulated and separate from the government (which is another illegitimate higher power, in Rand's eyes). This system lets those powerful Objectivist people do all they can in order to improve their own standing, but still while not violating the rights of other people or other people's pursuit of their own happiness.

Objectivism vs. Collectivism
The opposite end of the spectrum is Collectivism

Objectivism in Anthem | Study.com
 
Back
Top Bottom