- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- Messages
- 32,516
- Reaction score
- 5,321
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
when a right is recognized all that means is some one thinks you should have that right its made up
Those based in reality would disagree with such an extremist delusionary belief.
:lamo......
Are we talking about the real Constitution or the imaginary one you pretend you know about? Many of your posts remind me of a gentleman I met at a Tea Party rally at the Michigan state capitol when I was working there. He said he personally accepts no changes to the Constitution after the adoption of the 12th Amendment. I asked him how that denial of reality impacted his own life and he looked at me with a deer in the headlights look on his face.
Pointless laughter with no intelligent response seems to be the standard MO of the delusional. Thank you for confirming that.
tea party now.....:lamo..before if was libertarianism.......
it is so easy to see you constant desperation on threads.:2razz:
i cannot help but laugh at statements of yours..
Quote Originally Posted by haymarket
Pointless laughter with no intelligent response seems to be the standard MO of the delusional. Thank you for confirming that.
Your post makes no rational sense to the post of my you pretend to be replying to.
now all I have to do is repeat my post that you pretended to reply to
when you cannot stay on subject, and have to divert to libertarianism, tea party, this tells me you are frustrated and desperate to post something and make yourself feel better.
On the contrary - I am having a good old time exposing your nonsense.
sorry, when you have to talk about things which are not part of the discussion...its means simply......you have run out of an argument, and have folded your cards
... I ignore that "reality" because i'm sticking to the hypothetical posed in the OP.... and well, I'm not a bloodthirsty warmonger.
this isn't rocket science.
It is beyond funny how you pretend you can try to exchange barbs and quips with me like you did moments ago only to get skewered by me trying your own post right back at you like the laughter comments climaxing in 982 where you step right into it. Then all the sudden its this phony 'but... but ... but ... you're not staying on topic... and that's not playing fair' whining and crying and sobbing.
Its beyond hilarious.
yes it is for you, that you would have to bring the tea party and libertarianism into this thread which has nothing to do with those two things, but instead made you feel better about yourself.
you seem to do these things from time to time.....jump into different areas which are not being discussed, but i have become accustomed to it but it still makes me laugh when i see it.:2razz:
yes it is for you, that you would have to bring the tea party and libertarianism into this thread which has nothing to do with those two things, but instead made you feel better about yourself.
you seem to do these things from time to time.....jump into different areas which are not being discussed, but i have become accustomed to it but it still makes me laugh when i see it.:2razz:
Haymarket was looking at your perspective, just as you would if you were debating with a commie.
Haymarket was looking at your perspective, just as you would if you were debating with a commie.
You don't like it?TOUGH! :2wave: I could not care less. The reality is that almost every time we have these discussions about secession it seems the people who are the loudest supporters are also the ones who are right libertarians and share tea party sentiments.
And the mention of them is 100% appropriate and perfectly on topic. You don't like that? Again - TOUGH! :shock:
:2razz:
This response from you was thoroughly covered in post 982.
"secession it seems the people who are the loudest supporters are also the ones who are right libertarians and share tea party sentiments"
Haymarket quote
translation of this......"i don't have an argument for you, so i will attack libertarianism, and talk about the tea party" [for some resason]"
Haymarket quote
translation of this......"i don't have an argument for you, so i will attack libertarianism, and talk about the tea party" [for some resason]"
Stating that the majority of secessionists are right libertarians and share tea party sentiments is a attack?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?