• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would the abortion debate be different?

GEIxBattleRifle

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 15, 2012
Messages
3,306
Reaction score
1,024
Location
Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
If humans were to change from k-strategists to R-strategists?

As long as between two or four offspring reach adulthood for each breeding pair of R-strategists, no matter how many thousands of their offspring die, the species can continue to survive.
 
Last edited:
I don't think the question of abortion has anything to do with the survival of the species. The human race is not in danger of extinction, and if it is, having a whole lot more hungry mouths to feed won't prevent it.
 
In America, the abortion debate changes when we start to run low on WASP babies, like when the Catholics first came to the US and then started breeding like rabbits.
 
If humans were to change from k-strategists to R-strategists?

As long as between two or four offspring reach adulthood for each breeding pair of R-strategists, no matter how many thousands of their offspring die, the species can continue to survive.

Since the thing that poses the greatest threat to humanity is humans themselves I fail to see how having large, fluctuating populations as opposed to stable population growth would be the better route to take but abortion is not a population control mechanism in the US at least in its intent.
 
Back
Top Bottom