• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Would republicans support Syria intervention if Obama were white?

AtlantaAdonis

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
2,124
Reaction score
500
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war? The answer...they hate black people more than they love war. That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea? I can't think of a sane reason.
 

The Man

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
5,135
Reaction score
1,693
Location
York, Pennsylvania
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Obama is white. Or, as much white as he is black.
 

trfjr

Banned
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
3,114
Reaction score
1,004
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war? The answer...they hate black people more than they love war. That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea? I can't think of a sane reason.
its the difference between a leader and an amateur
Bush was able to get the backing of 30 other nations Obama cant even get the backing of his own nation
 

Fruityfact

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
1,385
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war? The answer...they hate black people more than they love war. That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea? I can't think of a sane reason.
They didn't mindlessly support it...just supported it off bad info and heightened emotions-we "all" did.
I think there was a generational gap that hadn't seen what "war" was really about. Now that this generation has seen war and its cost(lives/money/relations) they want no more of it-In other words our "Mission Accomplished" is still on our minds
 

AtlantaAdonis

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
2,124
Reaction score
500
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
They didn't mindlessly support it...just supported it off bad info and heightened emotions-we "all" did.
I think there was a generational gap that hadn't seen what "war" was really about. Now that this generation has seen war and its cost(lives/money/relations) they want no more of it-In other words our "Mission Accomplished" is still on our minds

Air strikes versus boots on the ground for 8 years. Clinton bombed Milosevic in Bosnia and not many republicans opposed it. What's different now?
 

Fruityfact

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
1,385
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
its the difference between a leader and an amateur
Bush was able to get the backing of 30 other nations Obama cant even get the backing of his own nation
Obama is a far superior leader to Bush--reality

Air strikes versus boots on the ground for 8 years. Clinton bombed Milosevic in Bosnia and not many republicans opposed it. What's different now?
The hawks in this country are becoming less hawkish
 

AtlantaAdonis

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
2,124
Reaction score
500
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
How so? They seem about the same to me, even eerily identical in a lot of ways.
One has a background as a community organizer, the other was an incompetent oil Baron.
One got into Harvard by his own merit, the other was a legacy admit.
One has an administration with connections to Halliburton and other defense contractors, the other doesn't.
One is an imperialist, the other an internationalist.
One has a Nobel Peace Prize, the other is reviled around the world.
One cares about ensuring all Americans have health care, the other doesn't.

I could go on and on and on and on. Change your lean to "Very Conservative" please.
 

trfjr

Banned
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
3,114
Reaction score
1,004
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Obama is a far superior leader to Bush--reality



The hawks in this country are becoming less hawkish
reality
Bush 30 nations including his own > Obama 1 nation not his own

what is your definition of a leader?
 

Brooks

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
1,131
Reaction score
130
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
I think there was a generational gap that hadn't seen what "war" was really about. Now that this generation has seen war and its cost(lives/money/relations) they want no more of it-In other words our "Mission Accomplished" is still on our minds
That's either borderline brilliant or brilliant.
 

Penderyn

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
1,618
Reaction score
276
Location
UK, Cymru mostly.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war? The answer...they hate black people more than they love war. That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea? I can't think of a sane reason.
They are/were, like Republicanism, stinking ideas, and of course racists are racists. Next question?
 

The Man

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
5,135
Reaction score
1,693
Location
York, Pennsylvania
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
One has a background as a community organizer, the other was an incompetent oil Baron.
One got into Harvard by his own merit, the other was a legacy admit.
One has an administration with connections to Halliburton and other defense contractors, the other doesn't.
One is an imperialist, the other an internationalist.
One has a Nobel Peace Prize, the other is reviled around the world.
One cares about ensuring all Americans have health care, the other doesn't.

I could go on and on and on and on. Change your lean to "Very Conservative" please.
You didn't name one reason why Obama is a superior leader to Bush. You named a bunch of reasons why he SHOULD BE a superior leader to Bush. In the real world, they're about the same, even eerily identical in a lot of ways. Their backgrounds don't matter one bit.
 
Last edited:

trfjr

Banned
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
3,114
Reaction score
1,004
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
One has a background as a community organizer, the other was an incompetent oil Baron.
One got into Harvard by his own merit, the other was a legacy admit.
One has an administration with connections to Halliburton and other defense contractors, the other doesn't.
One is an imperialist, the other an internationalist.
One has a Nobel Peace Prize, the other is reviled around the world.
One cares about ensuring all Americans have health care, the other doesn't.

I could go on and on and on and on. Change your lean to "Very Conservative" please.
and that idiot was able to get the backing of 30 nations and that smart Nobel Peace Prize winner that is reviled around the world cant even get the backing of his own

what a joke
 

Carleen

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Messages
7,649
Reaction score
3,119
Location
New Jersey
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war? The answer...they hate black people more than they love war. That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea? I can't think of a sane reason.
They just can't get past the fact that he was elected in the first place and when he won a second time it put them over the edge!
They try at every turn to make him look bad. It's all they've got going for them.
 

ocean515

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
36,760
Reaction score
15,464
Location
Southern California
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war? The answer...they hate black people more than they love war. That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea? I can't think of a sane reason.
Thanks for adding to the evidence of the liberal/progressive mind.
 

VanceMack

MSG Benavides TAB
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
73,927
Reaction score
31,111
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Stupidest ****ing question asked to date.

How about the democrats that oppose the attacks? Just a bunch of angry hate filled racists, correct?
 

Drake McHugh

Well-known member
Joined
May 23, 2013
Messages
628
Reaction score
138
Location
Brookfield,Wisconsin
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war? The answer...they hate black people more than they love war. That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea? I can't think of a sane reason.
Would you support this if Romney were potus. I know the answer to that one.
 

Fisher

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
17,002
Reaction score
6,913
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war? The answer...they hate black people more than they love war. That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea? I can't think of a sane reason.
The House GOP leadership supports strikes, and per CNN, the democrats are the ones that are giving the President the biggest problem. So you readily admit now that democrats hate black people?
 

bubbabgone

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
29,449
Reaction score
15,592
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war?
The answer...they hate black people more than they love war.
That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea?
I can't think of a sane reason
.
It shows.
 

Penderyn

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
1,618
Reaction score
276
Location
UK, Cymru mostly.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Stupidest ****ing question asked to date.

How about the democrats that oppose the attacks? Just a bunch of angry hate filled racists, correct?
People in the government party tend to support it. The Guardian claimed recently that only twenty of the two-hundred-plus tory MPs who voted to meddle in Syria believed in it.
 

Velvet Elvis

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
4,954
Reaction score
2,195
Location
Midwest
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
One has a background as a community organizer, the other was an incompetent oil Baron.
One got into Harvard by his own merit, the other was a legacy admit.
One has an administration with connections to Halliburton and other defense contractors, the other doesn't.
One is an imperialist, the other an internationalist.
One has a Nobel Peace Prize, the other is reviled around the world.
One cares about ensuring all Americans have health care, the other doesn't.

I could go on and on and on and on. Change your lean to "Very Conservative" please.
Hey...you forgot "black." Racist troll threads always need to include skin color.
 

phattonez

Catholic
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
30,796
Reaction score
4,233
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Why did republicans mindlessly support a war that lasted 8 years and costs trillions of dollars and leaves hundreds of thousands dead while pulling out all of the stops to stop strikes against a dictator who actually has chemical weapons that will be far cheaper and faster than the Iraq war? The answer...they hate black people more than they love war. That's really the only conclusion I can come to. I mean is there really any real reason Syria is a bad idea whereas Iraq was a good idea? I can't think of a sane reason.
Come up with absurd claim.

Provide no proof for absurd claim.

Therefore claim is proved.

Your logic is flawless.
 

phattonez

Catholic
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 3, 2009
Messages
30,796
Reaction score
4,233
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Besides, you're ignoring a far more obvious answer.

Obama is a Democrat and Republicans are not.
 
Top Bottom