Thanks for the personal complement.
An important point I was making is with the democrats dishonest vilification of President Bush, who I rigorously defended by the way against those ridiculous claims, with few exceptions those making the claims were either certified nutjobs of the democrat party and/or people I'd never heard of and most likely both. With respect to republican vilification of President Obama, those making the ridiculous claims happen to be some of the most respected leaders in our party.
Thanks for the personal complement.
An important point I was making is with the democrats dishonest vilification of President Bush, who I rigorously defended by the way against those ridiculous claims, with few exceptions those making the claims were either certified nutjobs of the democrat party and/or people I'd never heard of and most likely both. With respect to republican vilification of President Obama, those making the ridiculous claims happen to be some of the most respected leaders in our party. Then they use the unknown democrat nutjob as some sort of even stevens justification of leading, respected and highly influential Republicans acting in a similar way, thus promoting me to publicly point it out and vote in ways that hopefully will bring the GOP to its senses and return to being the party I can have faith in again.
Did Congress do that??? I don't seem to recall that ever being a topic of discussion on the floor of either House.well, it's an interesting idea, though poorly written out with laughable attempts at examples.
were Democrats held back in their ability to blame the Bush administration for mishandling the Iraq War and the 2008 financial meltdown because the left had spent the previous 4 years accusing him of secretly orchestrating 9/11?
Did Congress do that??? I don't seem to recall that ever being a topic of discussion on the floor of either House.
I didn't say Congress started that. In fact, I specifically mentioned Republican's most devoted fans (aka, fanatics) believing that. Is that what you meant to say about the 9/11 conpriracy, that they were only from the fanatics? It sure didn't look like that.Congress declared that Obama wasn't really a citizen? Wow, I must have missed that story.
I didn't say Congress started that. In fact, I specifically mentioned Republican's most devoted fans (aka, fanatics) believing that. Is that what you meant to say about the 9/11 conpriracy, that they were only from the fanatics? It sure didn't look like that.
I don't remember the Dems ever assigning someone like Starr to a Republican president.My point was that the claim that conservatives' behavior towards Obama has ever been more ridiculous than liberals behavior towards Bush is laughable; and that since their behavior didn't effect the Democrats in 2006 and 2008, I find it unlikely that the birthers are going to really effect Republicans in 2014 or 2016.
Defense of bush was rare...even a TV show called little bush aired.
I mean come on.
But if this were a republican you know the left would be all over this.
Is it Obama's turn?I don't remember the Dems ever assigning someone like Starr to a Republican president.
I find that an interesting claim.
Michael Moore, who became the face of the 9/11 conspiracy movement after Fahrenheit 9/11, was invited to the DNC and seated in the Presidential box next to President Carter. Can you name for me similar honoring by Republican leadership of the Birthers?
I'd never heard of Michael Moore until the 911 movie. Plus I didn't say there were no high profile democrats engaging in craziness or all republicans, just few and many. Besides, I joined the GOP because I was attracted to their seeming desire to not stoop to the levels of democrats, take the moral high road, strive to do the right things, patriotism over party, etc.
7 Birthers Speaking At The Republican Convention | ThinkProgress
And btw, I googled the answer to the question you asked. I've also learned since 2008 the insanity include demonizing people who cite sources not considered republican friendly as immoral people by some.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?