- Joined
- Jun 3, 2020
- Messages
- 21,417
- Reaction score
- 7,415
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
yes I didNo you didn't.
yes I didNo you didn't.
Your $2K annual allowance (like the “Fair tax” prebate?) has just greatly complicated that ‘simple’ taxation method. That annual “exemption” (at each possible point of sale?) idea would require a national ‘buyer ID’ database (with each seller having online access to it) to implement.
Should we take form the rich and give to the poor?
Exactly the same as anyone else's fair share.What about the people born into a bad situation? What is their fair share?
Isn't the car the collateral?auto loans don't require capitol or collateral. Business loans do.
Should we take form the rich and give to the poor?
Social security already has most of us in its data base. Require everyone who wants the exemption to apply for a social security card. Keep track of it through that system. Purchasers insert a card into a reader just like they do now with credit cards.
We do that already. Hals the country pays none. 9% pays half.
Hmm... what could possibly go wrong with a national ID card requirement in order to get a tax break. BTW, who supplies each provider of (taxable) goods/services with equipment necessary to access to that national ID database?
As a tax payer since the early 70's, I will say you are wrong.The tax system in this country, starting in the early 80's under Reagan, has specifically and purposefully benefited the riches 1%. It is the largest transfer of wealth in the history of any nation on earth. So yes, reverting back to even Reagan era taxation would be beneficial to the vast majority of americans, who have been hindered by the welfare handouts the rich have received over the past 40 years.
yes I did
well, the data we have over the past 40 years shows that I am correct...................As a tax payer since the early 70's, I will say you are wrong.
no obligation to do any such thing. I've already posted it. You are free to use the search function.Post #s and an explanation, or it didn't happen. I already scoured the entire thread once, and nothing you posted actually comes close to living up to your billing.
It is the way every country worksUsing the confiscatory powers of the government to "steal money from those who earned it and give it to those who did not is extremely immoral!
no obligation to do any such thing. I've already posted it. You are free to use the search function.
I would concur if the global market field was the same now as it was in the early 70's. With globalization, tax corporations higher, they move to countries with lower taxes. To get tax revenue back from them, we have to lower tax rates enough to make it so they want to come back here. This applies to people of wealth too, who can shelter their money in foreign banks. If we want to tax they money, we have to entice them with lower taxes than other counties offer.well, the data we have over the past 40 years shows that I am correct...................
you didn't, or you would have found it. you are lyingI did, and there's nothing there. You're lying.
Except this is not the case. Supply side economic policies is what led to this. Our corporate tax rates are not even remotely close to being high.I would concur if the global market field was the same now as it was in the early 70's. With globalization, tax corporations higher, they move to countries with lower taxes. To get tax revenue back from them, we have to lower tax rates enough to make it so they want to come back here. This applies to people of wealth too, who can shelter their money in foreign banks. If we want to tax they money, we have to entice them with lower taxes than other counties offer.
A smaller percentage of a large amount of money, greatly exceeds a high percentage of nothing!
I can't believe the static thinking the left has. Things are dynamic. One change creates changes in other areas.
It is the way every country works
Believe as you wish.Except this is not the case. Supply side economic policies is what led to this. Our corporate tax rates are not even remotely close to being high.
That's well understood by democrats, and the key reason why they keep the blacks on their plantation, and other poor people. And continue to make policies that keep them poor."A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul." - George Bernard Shaw
No country on earth operates with a fair tax system eitherThat's right....but at some point it becomes excessive and goes from funding the operation of government ...to taking money from those who earned it and giving it to those who did not....and that is wrong!
There is of course a better way....The Fair Tax!
Then why do black people vote Democrat?That's well understood by democrats, and the key reason why they keep the blacks on their plantation, and other poor people. And continue to make policies that keep them poor.
I'm ashamed to admit it but most of the people in my extended family are dyed-in-the-wool democrats and support government's redistribution of wealth.That's well understood by democrats, and the key reason why they keep the blacks on their plantation, and other poor people. And continue to make policies that keep them poor.