- Joined
- Apr 24, 2010
- Messages
- 9,640
- Reaction score
- 3,591
- Location
- Seoul/Chicago
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Is the UN worthless, like its predecessor the League of Nations?
I think so.
It's powerless militarily, economically, and politically. It failed to stop the Russian-Georgian war, and was unable to stop other wars like the conflicts between Israel and the Arab countries. The only function it has is as a powerless organization that speaks about its opinions on world affaris, which nobody listens to anyway. It can only condemn and strut, but it has no force to back up its words.
What do you think?
I think so.
It's powerless militarily, economically, and politically. It failed to stop the Russian-Georgian war, and was unable to stop other wars like the conflicts between Israel and the Arab countries. The only function it has is as a powerless organization that speaks about its opinions on world affaris, which nobody listens to anyway. It can only condemn and strut, but it has no force to back up its words.
What do you think?