• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

World Federation of Scientists Climate Panel: AGW Is No Longer a Planetary Emergency

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,767
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
The World Federation of Scientists, at its annual seminars on planetary emergencies, has been advised by its own climate monitoring panel that global warming is no longer a planetary emergency. The President of the Italian Senate, Judge Pietro Grasso … and the President of the Federation, Professor Antonino Zichichi {emeritus professor of Physics, U of Bologna}, said that care should be taken to examine carefully the basis for concern about CO2 emissions as well as the relevance and cost-effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures.

… “Our greatest concern at present is that the intellectual climate for scientific investigation of these matters has become so hostile and politicized that the necessary research and debate cannot freely take place. Political constraints take the form of declaring the underlying science to be settled when it clearly is not; defunding or denigrating research that is perceived to threaten the case for renewable energy; or the use of odious pejoratives like “denialist” to describe dissent from officially-sanctioned views on climate science.”

… Professor Essex called for “free and open debate on all aspects of climate science, even where hypotheses are put forward for examination that openly contradict the official positions of political entities.”

He said the panel found persuasive indications that climate models systematically understated natural climate variability and significantly exaggerated the impact of CO2 emissions. Accordingly, past, present and proposed policy measures could be shown not to provide net benefits to society regardless of the rate at which the planet might warm. Limited resources would be better devoted to more pressing issues.

Although this is the position of the climate monitoring panel of the Federation it is not the official position of the Federation. This report of the proceedings of the World Federation of Scientists comes through a blogger, Lord Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, and has not been confirmed.
 

AtlantaAdonis

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
649
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Re: World Federation of Scientists Climate Panel: AGW Is No Longer a Planetary Emerge

What credentials does this "world federation of scientists" have? Who funds them? What are the membership requirements?
 

fmw

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 2, 2013
Messages
14,490
Reaction score
3,778
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Re: World Federation of Scientists Climate Panel: AGW Is No Longer a Planetary Emerge

Even politics fixes itself over time.
 

Diogenes

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
4,980
Reaction score
3,059
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Re: World Federation of Scientists Climate Panel: AGW Is No Longer a Planetary Emerge

Gosh, you mean the emergency fixed itself? Wonder of wonders! :lamo :lamo
 

winston53660

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
29,262
Reaction score
10,125
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Re: World Federation of Scientists Climate Panel: AGW Is No Longer a Planetary Emerge

What credentials does this "world federation of scientists" have? Who funds them? What are the membership requirements?

I think they are the one's protecting us from the Legion of Doom

legion-doom-HOD.jpg
 

code1211

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
47,695
Reaction score
10,466
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Re: World Federation of Scientists Climate Panel: AGW Is No Longer a Planetary Emerge

What credentials does this "world federation of scientists" have? Who funds them? What are the membership requirements?

Uh-oh...

Sounds like the universal consensus is suffering a little chink in the armor...

Looks like they have a connection to CERN as well. Must be a bunch of Oil industry buffoons bought and paid for by international Big Oil Dollars.

Are Big oil Dollars actually bigger than regular dollars? Do these guys have a different design for their wallets? Just wondering...

History
<snip>
The WFS is a free association, which has grown to include more than 10,000 scientists drawn from 110 countries. All members share the same aims and ideals and contribute voluntarily to uphold the Federation's Principles. The Federation promotes international collaboration in science and technology between scientists and researchers from all parts of the world - North, South, East and West. The Federation and its members strive towards an ideal of free exchange of information, where scientific discoveries and advances are no longer restricted to a select few. The aim is to share this knowledge among the people of all nations, so that everyone may experience the benefits of the progress of science.
<snip>
 

Deuce

Outer space potato man
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 6, 2010
Messages
95,095
Reaction score
47,470
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Re: World Federation of Scientists Climate Panel: AGW Is No Longer a Planetary Emerge

So what are they basing this statement on?
 

code1211

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
47,695
Reaction score
10,466
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Re: World Federation of Scientists Climate Panel: AGW Is No Longer a Planetary Emerge

So what are they basing this statement on?



From the post in the OP, Lowdown has cut and pasted a challenge to the methodology used by the elite to curtail and rig the AGW Debate.

From what I've seen, this challenge seems to be pretty well justified.
 
Top Bottom