- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 122,485
- Reaction score
- 19,849
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Nor can women it seems
Sounds like you think Men cannot control their urge's.
Clue:
Men can,
Boys can't.
Maybe the man should have kept it in his pants...or if he really had to relieve that urge then he could have double bagged it. If a man doesn't want a women pregnant he can prevent it.
Sounds like you think Men cannot control their urge's.
Clue:
Men can,
Boys can't.
Nor can women it seems
Sex without consequence for the woman should she choose. I grew up in the age when if you got a girl pregnant you better like her enough to spend 18 years raising and supporting the child.Maybe the man should have kept it in his pants...or if he really had to relieve that urge then he could have double bagged it. If a man doesn't want a women pregnant he can prevent it.
Good luck. No state in the union works that way
Good luck getting a male opt out option...
Good luck getting a male opt out option...
But as I said, we already have that.The reality is we can make a better system where both men and women have the equal opportunity to opt out of parenthood
But as I said, we already have that.
But as I said, we already have that.
Of course we do, even if you do not see it that way.
A man that didn't want to be a father in the first place should not be on the hook for 18 years because the woman unilaterally decided not to terminate the pregnancy. There's way too much bias and sexism when it comes to men and fatherhood. If a woman can decide not to accept the responsibility of being a parent a man should have that option as well. Women have an out if they want one while the next 18 years of a man's life is dependent on the decisions of the woman. Independent women making independent decisions should be independently responsible for those decisions.
:bs . . .
:bs . . .
She can escape parenthood if she chooses.
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
I do not accept the "Don't have sex." argument here for the same reason I don't accept it when pro lifers argue against abortion. It's not a practical answer. It's a complete nonsense expectation that shows a real lack of empathy.
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
I didnt say he had to not have sex, anymore than she does. I said that both have to accept the consequences of the risk they choose to take.
She does. I showed she cant escape consequences...you just dont like the ones she has...but that's determined by biology. Not law.
So why shouldnt he? Please explain. He knowingly takes a risk...he knows US law. Please explain why "he" should have sex without consequences when women cannot? I mean, if this is about fair or equal, that certainly isnt.
I used Las Vegas gambling as an example...it can result in losing his house...but he is held accountable for a risk he knowingly took. Why not regarding pregnancy? She is.
Sometimes contraception doesn't work. And again "Don't have sex." is a nonsense expectation. You sound like a pro lifer arguing against abortion.
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
https://www.debatepolitics.com/abor...pt-out.html?highlight=post+conception+opt+out
I have debated this many times... this is one that I found from last year.
https://www.debatepolitics.com/abor...-part-ii.html?highlight=child+support+opt+out
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
Props.
Glad to see I'm not alone.
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
It'll be difficult with society too busy worried about sexism towards women to give a damn about sexism towards men.
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
The expression applies equally to both. Just because her consequences are different doesnt mean she can get out of them.
So apparently you believe that men are entitled to sex without consequences...yes or no?
It's not sexism, the law is equal. If there is a child, both parents are held accountable by law.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?