• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Woman Gets Money From Suing Police Who Killed 1 Son, Uses Money to Buy Guns For Other Son & His Gang

Roadvirus

Heading North
Dungeon Master
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
54,116
Reaction score
47,102
Location
Tennessee, USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative

This woman is not part of the real world. Buying guns for criminal minors...in California? With that state's strict gun laws? She's probably gonna get at least 15 - 20 yrs in jail.
 

Sounds like she wanted to make sure the police don't kill another son or his friends...

Anyway, how she used with the money in no now way exonerates the police killing for her 16 year old son.
 
Sounds like she wanted to make sure the police don't kill another son or his friends...
That is disgusting. You make it sound like she wants them to be able to attack cops

Anyway, how she used with the money in no now way exonerates the police killing for her 16 year old son
Actually it does. It shows she is a shitty parent. The one she bought guns for is already in a gang. It sounds like she is irresponsible in raising children to be productive, law-abiding members of society.
 
That is disgusting. You make it sound like she wants them to be able to attack cops

Or, at least defend themselves from them.

Actually it does. It shows she is a shitty parent. The one she bought guns for is already in a gang. It sounds like she is irresponsible in raising children to be productive, law-abiding members of society.

Sounds like a shitty police force.
 
Note: My posts above were partially snark. And I would never suggest giving guns to kids to protect themselves from the police…. I’d give them cameras and lessons in the law.

But a 5 Million dollar settlement speaks to a colossal ****-up on the part of the cops…and isn’t diminished by what the mother does with the money.
 

Sounds like it's being handled. Clearly not the brightest stars in the sky, if they're getting caught doing this stuff.

Some people are actual criminals on purpose, and I doubt any amount of money would make my mom think anything good about police after she sees what they did to her boy (I presume it will take ~900 gunshots to end the threat I represent to the general public.)

There's a lesson buried in there someplace about not making enemies unnecessarily, whatever authority you're swinging around.
 
This woman is not part of the real world. Buying guns for criminal minors...in California? With that state's strict gun laws? She's probably gonna get at least 15 - 20 yrs in jail.
That only shows how insanely totalitarian the system is. There's at most ONE crime in that situation, the fact that she gave a gun to a minor.
That is disgusting. You make it sound like she wants them to be able to attack cops
They should be able to defend themselves against cops. That's pretty sure the intention behind the act. She should get at most a suspended sentence, perhaps a fine or a warning.
Normally I'm for banning all guns, but when you have so many aggressive and murderous cops, anyone should be able to defend themselves against cops, including minors and former "criminals"(most of them are not real criminals, just victims of totalitarianism and overcriminalization)

Actually it does. It shows she is a shitty parent. The one she bought guns for is already in a gang. It sounds like she is irresponsible in raising children to be productive, law-abiding members of society.
It doesn't and you know it. Anyone who's not fully retarded understands that a crime is judged based on the acts of the criminal, not on third party trivia.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…