Though I have no doubts that Clinton did try to use his influence to land her a job, I don't recall it coming to fruition. Regardless, it was not a conflict of interest as it was not a White House job, correct?
It was sexual harassment, creating a hostile workplace by rewarding employees who engage in sex with you with favors and special treatment. It was sex on the job in the oval office. It was an illicit sexual affair which turned into subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice.
How is Wolfowitz a conflict of interest. She was transferring out of his realm of influence. He never hide the fact that they had an above board personal relationship, nothing illicit about it. From the get-go he kept the board and ethics committe informed and conferred with them on what should be done and althought Ms.Riza believed it was unfair that she had to leave her job and career even thought Wolfowitz had promise t
o avoid any conflict of interest and that he would have no direct involvement with her employment she left anyway and he helped to get her a new job at the State Department.
Clinton, OK. Wolfowitz, put him on trial.
And BTW FOX News is reporting tonight that the head of the ethics committe wrote him a letter complimenting him on how he handle the situation, above board and his complete cooperation with the ethics committe and invited him and Ms. Riva to dinner at his home once she was settled in her new job.
This is about member nations of the World Bank trying to undermine Wolfowitz and get him removed. Nothing more. Now watch the Dems put politics above supporting their country and join in the mob.
It matters because you're the one who brought it up. And I called you on it as I didn't see one iota of relevance. Did you not post:
Like Clinton did when he got caught in a romantic involvement and was using his position to gain her favor?
Yes I did, in response to
Originally Posted by
PeteEU 
And here was I thinking that Wolfowitz was one of the "brains" behind the neo con revolution.. turns out his brains are in his pants :2razz:
He should resign, no way any nation can trust him to lead the organisation when he has done something like this.
So yes I asked the obvious
"Like Clinton did when he got caught in a romantic involvement and was using his position to gain her favor?"
So let me return the question. Why did you mention it?
Well that's not returning the question but I think I covered it anyway.
So how about it?
So basically, you're saying your post doesn't matter. And for once, I agree with you.
:rofl how do you come to that conclusion. I think basically you want to avoid the subject.
Stick to the subject.
