OK so you ask a question, get an answer with a link that's definitely not zero, not a ban, ignore it, cite an article that says in fact 10,000 Iraqis were resettled during that year, then go off about how liberals have no credibility. What is not credible about EVIDENCE with hard numbers provided to you with a link? What do you want if not that? And even if we call the Iraqi "ban not a ban" an actual ban, it only affected refugees applying for permanent residence, and not to virtually every other Iraqi holding a visa. It was also a "ban" enacted after a credible threat, and involved only that country, not seven.
And if you have evidence for the six different BANS then present it. I haven't seen it. If you want to call the "ban not a ban" Iraqi deal one of those six, fine. You need five more.
Finally, who "ignored the violence that created those refugees"? You appear to be moving the goal posts all over the damn field and I have no idea what we're talking about now.