• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

With all respect to all nations

JOHNYJ said:
The funny thing about those that have caved in to the Muslim thugs is that they are " Liberal " Newspapers.The New YorkTimes the No#1 Liberal paper in America has caved to a bunch of muslim thugs. While they continue to print pictures insulting to christianity they dont have the guts when it comes to Islam. These liberal papers are the first ones to complain about any kind of censorship,now fold to a bunch of barbarians.


Welcome to the hypocritical "Global Left." When faced with the opportunity to stand for what they belive in, they always appease their way out of it and turn the situation into a future problem for someone else to solve. The truth is that the "Global Left" is so intellectually decrepit, so infected by dishonesty, so morally feeble that it has only breath enough to condemn American actions as they trip over ways to soothe the temper tantrumed Muslim world.
 
Volker said:
This depends on what they want.


Why does it depend...... They are rioting and killing and burning and destroying. You have set the precedent of appeasement. So you now deserve everything you get for folding to one minority group. You will then have to deal with all the others and cave to there demends or your cities will be torched by your own lack of backbone.
 
Calm2Chaos said:
SO you better fold for everyone. BEcause as soon aas you do this what about the next group that riot to gtet what they want... what do you do then. YOU going to cave in to there demands also....I really want to know what you plans are for the next group that does this...................................

One of the proofs of the liberal bias of the press. Is the lack of coverage of their duplicity in this.Since most of them have gone along with the NY Times and caved to the Muslim thugs. They don't report what they have done. So its only in the conservative press that you see any coverage of this sell out.
 
Calm2Chaos said:
Why does it depend...... They are rioting and killing and burning and destroying. You have set the precedent of appeasement. So you now deserve everything you get for folding to one minority group. You will then have to deal with all the others and cave to there demends or your cities will be torched by your own lack of backbone.
But, what is, if the demands of this group are justified?
Or if it is about something, which is simply not worth fighting about?
Will you deny it on principle?
 
Volker said:
But, what is, if the demands of this group are justified?
Or if it is about something, which is simply not worth fighting about?
Will you deny it on principle?

But they aren't justified. Freedom is always worth fighting for, and make no mistake thats what this is about. Sometimes principle is all you have to stand on. The fact is you can't expect to cave to one and not cave to them all. You are inviting groups to essentially blackmail you into caving for there cause because they know you have a history of doing so. And there question will be why is there cause more important then ours...
 
Calm2Chaos said:
But they aren't justified.
We are still talking about the caricatures? Sure they are.

Calm2Chaos said:
Freedom is always worth fighting for, and make no mistake thats what this is about.
I lived as many years in a so-called unfree society as I lived in a so-called free society.
You know what? Freedom is overrated, this is my opinion.

Calm2Chaos said:
And there question will be why is there cause more important then ours...
Ours? Why should the cause of some caricaturists should be my cause or yours?
 
Volker said:
We are still talking about the caricatures? Sure they are.


Wrong again. A cartoon in civilized society is never a reason to riot, burn, destroy, kill.... This is very simple. If your not an animal this does not happen. If your going to live in a free society then you have to be able to accept opinions that differ then yours. When this occurs torching a city is not a reasonable response in any form. If you think it is then you should move to a country that has no problems with your animal behavior.

Volker said:
I lived as many years in a so-called unfree society as I lived in a so-called free society.
You know what? Freedom is overrated, this is my opinion.


You keep that opinion, I prefer my freedoms. We live in this country everyday with differing opinions and views. Luckily I guess we have kept the animals out to a degree. All though I will be the first to admit that our punk azz liberal press has buried this story because there backbone is lacking also.

Volker said:
Ours? Why should the cause of some caricaturists should be my cause or yours?

Because they are burning, destroying, killing .... And they are attempting to make a precedent that may be used in other countries. And I refuse to lay down for a group of people that think this is acceptable.
 
Calm2Chaos said:
A cartoon in civilized society is never a reason to riot, burn, destroy, kill.... This is very simple.
Simple enough for me, I did not say, this behaviour is acceptable.

Calm2Chaos said:
If your going to live in a free society then you have to be able to accept opinions that differ then yours.
We have to accept different opinions, we don't have to accept insults.
Some people do and this is their thing.
Some people have the backbone to protest.
This is their thing, too, as long as they stay peaceful and do not insult someone else.
 
Volker said:
Simple enough for me, I did not say, this behaviour is acceptable.


We have to accept different opinions, we don't have to accept insults.
Some people do and this is their thing.
Some people have the backbone to protest.
This is their thing, too, as long as they stay peaceful and do not insult someone else.

And the world does not have a problem with peacefull protest. That however is not whats happening. The problem is the rioting that is going on. If you don't like and or can't accept a country or its people's freedoms. then you should move to a place that is more in line with your thinking. They should have gone out there given the rioters 3 hours to clear the streets. After that time riot police and rubber bullets, and tear gas. If that doesn't work, you escalate in a proportional manner. But you can't allow these people to take a city/country hostage.
 
Protests in Germany were peacefully.
I heared in UK, some protesters were tasteless, but not violant.
Some protests in Asia and Africa were violant, but there was police to stop them, too.
 
Volker said:
Protests in Germany were peacefully.
I heared in UK, some protesters were tasteless, but not violant.
Some protests in Asia and Africa were violant, but there was police to stop them, too.

There not all peacfull

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4684652.stm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4728616.stm

4-5 Feb: Danish embassies in Damascus and Beirut attacked
6-12 Feb: Twelve killed in Afghanistan as security forces try to suppress protests
13-18 Feb: Five killed as protests break out across Pakistan
17 Feb: Ten killed in Libya as protesters target the Italian consulate in Benghazi
18 Feb: Sixteen people are killed during protests in northern Nigeria

Propert destroyed... People dead.....

This is what the world sees
 
4-5 Feb: Danish embassies in Damascus and Beirut attacked
Asia

6-12 Feb: Twelve killed in Afghanistan as security forces try to suppress protests
Asia

13-18 Feb: Five killed as protests break out across Pakistan
Asia

17 Feb: Ten killed in Libya as protesters target the Italian consulate in Benghazi
Africa

18 Feb: Sixteen people are killed during protests in northern Nigeria
Africa
 
Volker said:
4-5 Feb: Danish embassies in Damascus and Beirut attacked
Asia

6-12 Feb: Twelve killed in Afghanistan as security forces try to suppress protests
Asia

13-18 Feb: Five killed as protests break out across Pakistan
Asia

17 Feb: Ten killed in Libya as protesters target the Italian consulate in Benghazi
Africa

18 Feb: Sixteen people are killed during protests in northern Nigeria
Africa


Not to peacfull
 
Calm2Chaos said:
Not to peacfull


Do you think what you saw on tv sets is the 1,300,000,000 Muslims ?
When posted my message i was trying to let you know that there are if not 99% then 90% of muslims who disapprove all the violence took place..

you believe that we do not have the right to protect our prophet (PBUH) from being insulted.. We are not saying that you shouldn't have an opinion about Islam or prophet muhammad (PBUH) or Muslims in general .. we are saying express it but do not use insults as a way..!!!
if we will behave that way then sooner or later people will be fighting each other in the streets .. we are all humans eventually and we should treat each other with respect
 
Gardener said:
Belief systems are a choice. Trouble begins when people treat belief systems as if they did not involve choice, and live in a world of absolutes.

Intrinsic to any belief system is a sense of chauvenism. This chauvenism derives from the sense of rightness we all attach to our beliefs and is a product of our defense mechanisms. It is the chauvenism that leads to the intolerance
.

I absolutely agree with you

The question I would ask is why, if at all, Islam produces more than its share of those who treat their religion in terms of absolutes and for whom the magnitude of their chauvenism is so great

That is not true, i said it before there are 1,300,000,000 Muslims around the worlds and the majority disapprove the violence taking place. There are plenty of great muslim examples around the world butunfortunately the voice of violence is being louder because of all the media.

I agree that the cartoons were offensive, but they pale in comparison to the revolting anti Jewish blood libels appearing regularly in various Islamic countries. If one is to respect religion, then let's lead by example. If people only want their own religion respected while offering no respect towards others, they are acting in an extremely chauvenistic manner.

Actually its anti-Israilis my friend people are relating jews & Israil and considering them as the two faces of one coin. its not the religion, it is Israil.

Since religion is a choice, Muslims are as free as Christian or Jewish people (or any other religion) to choose which aspects of their religion they with to follow. There are aspects to all that are troublesome and problemantic to the other, and if people choose to hone in on these aspects of their religion, they do so by choice. The very first book of the Christian New testament contains the sermon on the mount, yet some Christians ignore that while focusing on aspects oft he religion that support their intolerant attitudes towards others. In Islam, the notion of Dhimmi is troublesome to me as are some of the direct references to other religions as well as the practice of al takeyya, yet there are also some wonderful passages in the Q'ran as well.

My question I would ask Muslims is this: Which aspects of Islam do you follow and which do you not? What aspects do you feel obliged to explain away and which do you admit can be troublesome for others? To what degree do you view your religion as absolute?

We Muslims do not have the option of following some of Islam and rejecting other aspects. actually a denial of part of Islam is a denial of it as whole ( even a denial of Moses or Jesus is a denial to Islam) We believe in Islam as a way of life .. for example, when a company develops a certain product, they issue the related handbook for it .. Same thing is applicable to Islam we believe that every single thing mentioned in holy Quran & Sunnah is our handbook because God who created us,and if we follow it properly we will be the same nation as his nation, prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and it was an amazing example of true muslims.
I believe that "Jihad" concept is misinterpreted among radical muslims & non muslims..
Jihad doesn't mean go through war for the sake of enforcing Islam, Jihad takes place on two level:
-self jihad: meaning fighting your self in order not to do the things that god forbid us to do such as drinking, Adultery, lying,...etc. Also self Jihad means spending your soul for the sake of god when Islam or Muslims are in danger (attacked) and you will be rewarded in Heaven. Moreover fighting satan who tries to drive you away from your religion is a sort of Jihad.

- Wealth Jihad: spending your money ( even if you are not that wealthy) to help the poor ( muslims & non muslims) and other nations when they are in need . also spend your money to help Muslims Army when they are going through war.
Bottom line is Jihad is not just fighting the enemy in War, Jihad can be fighting for morals, fighting to survive, fighting to be a good example, fighting an illness, fighting to raise your kids in a difficult world

Jihad concept now turned into a frightening concept to many people.
Islam drew every line to left us up as a nation we muslims believe that every aspect in Islam is there for a reason.

As for notion of Dhimmi, tell me exactly how do you interpret it so i can explain it further to you.
Practices of Takiyya is only allowed in Islam in the cases of Fear or threat. Fear or threat if you will be in danger for your religion. for example you were getting tortured to convert to some other religion & there is no way out ..
it can also be used in situations to patch things up between 2 parties during a conflict like a husband & his wife, or two families .. its for a good cause if it will bring a peace of mind to the 2 parties or even to the world.

I think if there is to be any real peace between people holding different religious views, they ALL must be willing to engage in a little bit of self examination as well as honest criticism of their own religion to the degree they find the good stuff. Otherwise, these belief ststems will only lead to violence by those who use their religion to exclude others instead of looking for the commonality.
I 100% agree with you
 
Peaceful Muslim said:
We Muslims do not have the option of following some of Islam and rejecting other aspects. actually a denial of part of Islam is a denial of it as whole ( even a denial of Moses or Jesus is a denial to Islam) We believe in Islam as a way of life ..

http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=247169&postcount=62


“006.055
YUSUFALI: Thus do We explain the signs in detail: that the way of the sinners may be shown up.
PICKTHAL: Thus do We expound the revelations that the way of the unrighteous may be manifest.
SHAKIR: And thus do We make distinct the communications and so that the way of the guilty may become clear.”
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/006.qmt.html
 
DivineComedy said:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=247169&postcount=62


“006.055
YUSUFALI: Thus do We explain the signs in detail: that the way of the sinners may be shown up.
PICKTHAL: Thus do We expound the revelations that the way of the unrighteous may be manifest.
SHAKIR: And thus do We make distinct the communications and so that the way of the guilty may become clear.”
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/006.qmt.html

There is a difference between denial and not acting according to the rule..
 
Peaceful Muslim said:
There is a difference between denial and not acting according to the rule..

We know you are not in denial of the Golden Rule, but not acting according to the rule because you have given your souls to Shaitain to fulfill a personal gratification for land makes your “nation as muslims” psychopaths.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/showpost.php?p=249407&postcount=65
 
Back
Top Bottom