• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Winston Churchill on Islam

hafez

New member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
28
Reaction score
7
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.


This man spoke the truth then and it rings ever true now. He was the only man who saw Hitler for what he was I hope the west heed his words of wisdom one last time.
 

Degreez

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
3,216
Reaction score
1,021
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.


This man spoke the truth then and it rings ever true now. He was the only man who saw Hitler for what he was I hope the west heed his words of wisdom one last time.
Why should any Muslim care what Winston Churchill thinks of their religion? This is the same man who supported the Muslim League when it suited his agenda (when they went against the Indian Congress). He hoped the conflict between the two "would be bitter and bloody". This is the same man who held Hitler's same view that ethnicities were not equal. This is the same man who supported terrorism:

It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed... I feel the need for more precise concentration upon military objectives such as oil and communications behind the immediate battle-zone, rather than on mere acts of terror and wanton destruction, however impressive.
 

jmh423

Banned
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
76
Reaction score
25
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.


This man spoke the truth then and it rings ever true now. He was the only man who saw Hitler for what he was I hope the west heed his words of wisdom one last time.
Sir Winston also had some choice words regarding zionist, communist Jews.....Should the "west heed these words of wisdom" also, or only those that pertain to Moslems?

Winston Churchill on Jews and Communism

"In 1920, Churchill wrote a full page article for the Illustrated Sunday Herald on 8 February 1920 detailing the Jewish involvement in the revolution. Churchill discusses in this article the split between Jews: some are Communists, he wrote, while others are Jewish nationalists. Churchill favored the Jewish nationalists, (and of course they indeed fall foul of the Jewish Communists, eventually becoming bitter enemies) and he appealed to what he called "loyal Jews" to ensure that the Communist Jews did not succeed. Churchill went even further and blamed the Jews for "every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century", writing :

"This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new. From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany) and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders." (ibid)

Churchill also pointedly accused Leon Trotsky (Bronstein) of wanting to establish a "world wide Communistic state under Jewish domination" in this article."


What do you think of Mr Churchill's assertions regarding a "world wide Communistic State under Jewish domination"? Should we also be on the look out for this?

Cheers
 
Last edited:

Korimyr the Rat

Baby Eating Monster
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
19,553
Reaction score
15,756
Location
Cheyenne, WY
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Why should any Muslim care what Winston Churchill thinks of their religion? This is the same man who supported the Muslim League when it suited his agenda (when they went against the Indian Congress). He hoped the conflict between the two "would be bitter and bloody". This is the same man who held Hitler's same view that ethnicities were not equal. This is the same man who supported terrorism:
Everyone supports terror when it suits them. They only cry like little bitches about it when it's turned on them. And just because you use a tool does not mean that you must respect it-- Winston Churchill did what was right for his people as was his duty and the rest of the world be damned.
 

spud_meister

Veni, vidi, dormivi!
Dungeon Master
DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 6, 2009
Messages
36,117
Reaction score
21,520
Location
Didjabringabeeralong
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Communist
What do you think of Mr Churchill's assertions regarding a "world wide Communistic State under Jewish domination"? Should we also be on the look out for this?

Cheers
Why do you think that Jews are a homogeneous people that always work together? Why does it mean it's Jewish conspiracy simply 'cause a person who, though born Jewish, denounced Judaism?

Religion: Born Jewish, as an adult Trotsky denounced all religion, claimed to be an Internationalist
Leon Trotsky - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There's more reason to assume Trotsky wanted a world wide communist state under moustachioed men than a Jewish one.
 

jmh423

Banned
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
76
Reaction score
25
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Why do you think that Jews are a homogeneous people that always work together? Why does it mean it's Jewish conspiracy simply 'cause a person who, though born Jewish, denounced Judaism?


Leon Trotsky - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There's more reason to assume Trotsky wanted a world wide communist state under moustachioed men than a Jewish one.
I do not think that Jews are a homogenous people who always work together and neither did Churchill. Read his article. However some Jews such as Trotsky and those who bankrolled him from New York, London and Berlin DO fit the conspiratorial mold that Sir Winston wrote about. I do not believe that any significant percentage of Jews is involved wittingly in any conspiracy. What I am talking about is a small cabal that involves people hiding behind all three major religions. For example, protestants such as Rockefellers and Morgans, the Vatican wing which involves other major banking houses, Jews such as Rothschild, Schiff, and others and Muslims such as the House of Saud. It has nothing to do with religion, but rather money, power and control over the masses. Religions are used as cover by these duplicitous war mongering murderous theives.

Thanks
 
Top Bottom