" It requires people to determine those rules and people to enforce those rules"
There is a lot to say about this, but isn't it very strange and illogical this? I mean why do you need people determine rules and enforce those rules? Do you not see something very wrong with this?
No. We need rules so that we can get along with each other. And we need someone to enforce them so that the stronger party can't just choose to ignore them.
And voila, you have government.
Here is the strange thing though. We 'need rules" because otherwise 'we' won't behave, right?
Right. Except it's not strange at all. It is, in fact, an historical axiom.
Well, it is also an historical axiom that 'government' and the believe in 'authority" has caused enormous chaos & deaths.
But that aside for now.
Ok, so we agree that without 'government' we won't behave because of some things I mentioned, which means
they can't be trusted to do the right thing on their own.
But of what people does the 'government' exist? Well, the people in the 'government" are pulled from the same people who couldn't behave because of stupidity, psychopathy, anger, charachterfaults, whatever.In other words , it is a subset of the same people who can't be trusted to do the right thing on their own.
How the hell can that improve the situation? It doesn't it of course. It is extremely illogical.
" It requires people to determine those rules and people to enforce those rules"
There is a lot to say about this, but isn't it very strange and illogical this? I mean why do you need people determine rules and enforce those rules? Do you not see something very wrong with this?
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
Here is the strange thing though. We 'need rules" because otherwise 'we' won't behave because of all kind of negative things people can do, stupidty, psychopathy, dumbness and so on, right?
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
Nope, that actually isnt the correct answer.
Ok, can you explain and what is the correct answer, according to you?
And btw I am not talking about no rules, I am talking about no rulers ( government, authority)
That is a big difference.
You see, it is very strange where 'government/authority' gets it 'authority" from.
if you look into it, 'government/authority' is an illusion, a myth, a superstition if you will.
It can't really exist except in people's head, and that makes for a very dangerous situation.
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
"But at least there isn't as much of these things as there would be without a government where everyone does whatever they please."
That's the question then, eh?! But people are so indoctrinated with the believe that without 'government' there will be chaos.
But 'government' is by its nature immoral and hence, causes a lot of chaos. Lots of normal and good people do things they normally wouldn't think about doing, beause of believe in 'goverment' and 'authority". Like people shooting people, like stealing things that don't belong to them. kidnapping people, send people oversees to kill whole innocent families.If it wasn't for the believe in 'authority'(government) they would never do these things!
Another question, where does 'goverment' gets its 'authority' from?
Furthermore, the 'government' rules are enforced by 'police". But police is by deafult immoral and wrong.
( I am not referring to what is going on right now,I am talking just in general.)
Government is no more moral or immoral than a computer program. Is it nothing more than a set of instructions that we require everyone to abide by. It gets its authority from the will of the people who choose to abide by these rules.
"The institution of law enforcement is not immoral by default. It is, in fact, moral by default."
I think having a 'governent' is extremely destructive, and that we are really way beter off without any form of government. I understand this sounds absurd for a lot of people when they read this. But even any form of 'government' is logically impossible. Why? Because 'government' rest on 'authority' and "authority' is actually impossible. I am not referring to people who are an 'authority" in their field, but 'authority' that can use 'force" (e.g. police, military etc.)
Let's explore.
Not if the use of English gets like the OP title. Senseless.
Well, it is also an historical axiom that 'government' and the believe in 'authority" has caused enormous chaos & deaths.
But that aside for now.
Ok, so we agree that without 'government' we won't behave because of some things I mentioned, which means
they can't be trusted to do the right thing on their own.
But of what people does the 'government' exist? Well, the people in the 'government" are pulled from the same people who couldn't behave because of stupidity, psychopathy, anger, charachterfaults, whatever.In other words , it is a subset of the same people who can't be trusted to do the right thing on their own.
How the hell can that improve the situation? It doesn't it of course. It is extremely illogical.
The situation can be improved by not voting for psychopaths, for example.
What I think you , and others , are looking for is an all omnipotent . pure,good, flawless etc "government". That will NEVER exist.
It is very clear that that is a non-existent entity.
One day we have to accept that wat we call "government' is a deeply criminal organisation.
There is no way around it.
what do you mean?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?