Will Clinton Choose Warren To Appease Bernie And His Supporters?

[Moderate Right]

Is this the bone she throws to Bernie to get him onboard? If not, what bones does she throw Bernie?

 

[humbolt]

I don't think Hillary's benefactors on Wall Street will accept Warren.

 

[Renae]

Is this the bone she throws to Bernie to get him onboard? If not, what bones does she throw Bernie?

She points out to the Berniebots that not voting for her = Trump. They vote Dem straight line because they know old Hillary is a more likely to pander to their pathetic sense of entitlement then Trump is.

 

[nota bene]

I don't think Clinton will choose somebody who might outshine her, and Warren might. And a two-woman ticket is problematic too.

 

[Moderate Right]

Is it all just a game to show Bernie supporters that Warren is being "considered"?

 

[Crovax]

Is it all just a game to show Bernie supporters that Warren is being "considered"?

It's got to be. I don't see how Warren can be a serious contender with her fauxcahontas problem.

 

[Abbazorkzog]

She will not.

 

[fmw]

I think it would be a good move for her. Warren is a strong attack dog. Hopefully she doesn't take that as an insult.

 

[Frank Apisa]

Like people have been saying for years:

NOBODY WILL ACCEPT A MAJOR PARTY PRESIDENTIAL TICKET WITH TWO MEN ON IT.

Same damn thing applies to two women...no matter what some of you think!

 

[blaxshep]

I see Warren prosecuting Clinton not running with her

 

[DamnYankee]

I don't think Clinton will choose somebody who might outshine her, and Warren might. And a two-woman ticket is problematic too.

A tree stump outshines The Queen of Corruption.

 

[coldjoint]

A tree stump outshines The Queen of Corruption.

Tree stumps is a pretty good description of Hillarys legs.

 

[eohrnberger]

I don't think Hillary's benefactors on Wall Street will accept Warren.

Wall Street has already made their displeasure known over Warren as VP. Yanked on Hillary's chain of which they have the other end, due to all the speaking 'fees' (bribes really) they've paid.

Wall Street cash or Elizabeth Warren: Hillary's choice

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...all-street-threatens-clinton-over-warren.html

 

[DamnYankee]

Tree stumps is a pretty good description of Hillarys legs.

:lamo

Good one!

 

[TobyOne]

Bernies supporters aren't going anywhere. There's no need to placate them. Hilary has done the right thing up to this point which is to ignore them.

 

[blaxshep]

Bernies supporters aren't going anywhere. There's no need to placate them. Hilary has done the right thing up to this point which is to ignore them.

A June 14th Bloomberg Politics national poll of likely voters in November’s election found that barely half of those who favored Sanders — 55 percent — plan to vote for Clinton. Instead, 22 percent say they’ll vote for Trump, while 18 percent favor Libertarian Gary Johnson. “I’m a registered Democrat, but I cannot bring myself to vote for another establishment politician like Hillary,” says Laura Armes, a 43-year-old homemaker from Beeville, Texas, who participated in the Bloomberg poll and plans to vote for Trump. “I don’t agree with a lot of what Trump says. But he won’t owe anybody. What you see is what you get.”

Nearly Half of Sanders Supporters Won't Support Clinton - Bloomberg Politics

 

[nota bene]

Tree stumps is a pretty good description of Hillarys legs.

Very depressing that in 2016 there are still some who are going to attack a female candidate based on her physical appearance...particularly when there is so much legit, non-sexist criticism to offer.

 

[coldjoint]

Very depressing that in 2016 there are still some who are going to attack a female candidate based on her physical appearance...particularly when there is so much legit, non-sexist criticism to offer.

Very depressing that the ability to take a joke is now history because of emasculation and grievance politics, PC, and the rest of the liberal progressive narrative.

 

[Frank Apisa]

A June 14th Bloomberg Politics national poll of likely voters in November’s election found that barely half of those who favored Sanders — 55 percent — plan to vote for Clinton. Instead, 22 percent say they’ll vote for Trump, while 18 percent favor Libertarian Gary Johnson. “I’m a registered Democrat, but I cannot bring myself to vote for another establishment politician like Hillary,” says Laura Armes, a 43-year-old homemaker from Beeville, Texas, who participated in the Bloomberg poll and plans to vote for Trump. “I don’t agree with a lot of what Trump says. But he won’t owe anybody. What you see is what you get.”

Nearly Half of Sanders Supporters Won't Support Clinton - Bloomberg Politics

Hummm...someone from TEXAS who is going to vote for Trump.

Whoever woulda thunk it!

 

[Skeptic Bob]

Hillary takes her marching orders from Wall Street and Wall Street won't allow it. So no.

 

[tres borrachos]

Is this the bone she throws to Bernie to get him onboard? If not, what bones does she throw Bernie?

No, HRC won't choose her. There is no benefit to it. And Wall Street won't allow it.

 

[eohrnberger]

Very depressing that in 2016 there are still some who are going to attack a female candidate based on her physical appearance...particularly when there is so much legit, non-sexist criticism to offer.

Nota, that's a fair point. Especially when there's this:

• EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton once called disabled children at an Easter egg hunt 'f***ing ree-tards' and referred to Jews as 'stupid k***s' while Bill called Jesse Jackson a 'damned n****r,' claims Bill's former lover
• BOOK: Hillary Called Disabled Children ‘Ree-Tards’ and Called Jews ‘K***s,’ Bill Called Jesse Jackson N-Word
• Hillary Clinton Called Disabled Children ‘f***ing ree-tards,’ Referred to Jews as ‘stupid k***s,’ Claims Bill’s Former Lover
• SHOCK: ProAbortion Hillary calls special needs children f**king retards
• Hillary Clinton Caught Referring To Disabled Children As ‘F*cking Ree-Tards’ – It’s Over For Her
• HILLARY ON DISABLED CHILDREN During Easter Egg Hunt: “When are they going to get those f*****g ree-tards out of here?”

If true, it would be very bad for her. Given the sources here, it's fair to question that. But it's lack of coverage in the Biased Main Stream Media, well, that doesn't mean anything, as they are deep in the tank for Hillary, and probably wouldn't cover it if it were true.

I leave it to each forum member to make up their own minds on this.

 

[DamnYankee]

No, HRC won't choose her. There is no benefit to it. And Wall Street won't allow it.

Crooked Clinton will pick her if she's corrupt.

 

[nota bene]

Very depressing that the ability to take a joke is now history because of emasculation and grievance politics, PC, and the rest of the liberal progressive narrative.

Speaking of history (or herstory, if you prefer), you've had 40 years to realize that focusing on a female candidate's physical attractiveness is sexist.

I am very, very sorry if you feel emasculated or aggrieved. The good news, however, is that there is plenty to criticize about everybody without stooping to criticizing somebody's legs or thighs.

 

[iguanaman]

Tree stumps is a pretty good description of Hillarys legs.

And an orange orangutan is an excellent description of Trumps mother...