I would LOVE to know "who planned it," if in fact someone planned to actually enter the Congress and disrupt the proceedings.
Like who organized those "red hats" led by Mr. Ray Epps that were seeking entry into the Capitol as declared the night prior (to the derision of everyone who heard them that night). Those same "Red Caps" led by that same Mr. Epps who convinced people to head to the capitol early and then convinced certain members to break down barricades and urged the crowd using bullhorns to "enter the capitol."
However, I don't see this 01/06 "Committee" doing any such thing. Their SOLE purpose (after failing to successfully impeach Trump for it) is to try to find a way to charge him anyway.
Well if this were a true "fact finding" committee in THIS regard, then where is the invetigation into why:
Pelosi turned down the offer of National Guard protection, approved by President Trump?
Why were the Capitol Police not fully staffed and prepared?
Why didn't Pelosi seek assistance from the D.C. police?
Those are just a few questions a true investigation would seek to answer.
It is quite easy to avoid another such incident. Simply take steps suggested by the above questions whenever there is a concern. After all, isn't that what some States and locales did during the various "approved" demonstrations (read RIOTS) that occurred with Democrat blessings during the Trump Administration?
I'm sick of all the ad hominin labeling, straw man deflections, and confirmation bias projecting that YOUR side of the argument always pushed forward whenever your assertions are challenged.
But one has to deal with what one is presented with.