• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why would anyone in their right minds make arguments against sealing the border

Of course we should follow the law, and I don't expect meaningful reform in either direction to come for a while. I'm just saying what we should do.

btw: The unskilled workers are coming either way; give them a path to rise up

The bulk of unemployed Americans are unskilled. That is what makes this illegal migration from poorer nations so much worse for our citizens.

Where is this administration's emphathy for our unemployed unskilled workers.
 
I never called for an open border or not enforcing laws, but an easier way to get in.



Why do there need to be laws currently supporting it? I'm talking about how we should change the laws, and pointing out that maybe there wouldn't be such an illegal immigration problem if the demographic that has the highest demand for immigration didn't have the most difficult time of making it in legally.

An argument that the problem with illegals being here would be sovled by changing the law so that they are not illegals is the same as saying that if we change the laws so that murder is not a crime then our murder rate will go down. Not sure that that is really addressing the problem at hand.
 
...sealing the best we can.

What do you mean by "the best we can"? How much should we spend on it? We currently spend about $36 billion between the border and immigration law enforcement inside the US. On average, we're spending about $113k for every illegal immigrant we catch and deport either at the border or inside the country. How much more do you suggest spending?

It's like the "war on drugs"- a hole you can pour an infinite amount of money and civil rights into without ever denting it. We've spent like $1 trillion on the war on drugs so far and drug use hasn't fallen at all really.

Wouldn't a guest worker program, which would generate money instead of costing it, be a better first step?
 
An argument that the problem with illegals being here would be sovled by changing the law so that they are not illegals is the same as saying that if we change the laws so that murder is not a crime then our murder rate will go down. Not sure that that is really addressing the problem at hand.

No. It's not the same. Most the reasons illegal immigrants are a problem are mostly related to them not having legal standing- we have no way to track them, they're afraid to go to the police to report crime, they don't pay taxes, they don't have insurance, etc. So, getting them paying taxes and on the books solves the problems. You can make it a long and painstaking path to citizenship, much less attractive than the normal legal route, but just refusing to let them into the system to pay taxes makes no sense. They're not going anywhere no matter what we do, so better to try to eliminate the downsides of having them here.
 
Watched one of those investigative shows a few weeks back. They went to a small Arizona town right on the border. There is no federal border fencing here, only fences that the locals have put up and patrol. The reporter went to the fence with some local high school students. They tell him to listen. The camera pans the Mexican side for some seconds and then you hear it, gunfire in the distance. The students point to black smudges dangling in the sky a distance away. Those are from structures that are burning. The students are very worried. There is a brutal drug war going on across the border and it is coming this way. The locals have already discovered cartel observation posts on the Arizona side. The students feel that it is only a matter of time before what they can see and hear on the Mexican side, becomes their reality.
 
They're not going anywhere no matter what we do, so better to try to eliminate the downsides of having them here.

Looks like you are suggesting giving up and just make them legit. I believe we can make a change by enacting employer sanction laws, providing States with more local authority dealing with illegals, chaning the law where any vehicle crossing into the US must have US insurance (like Mexico requires to have Mexican insurance).

It is interesting Obama wants employers held accountable, yet his administration is taking Arizona to court over a 2007 employer sanction law in which they could loose their license if they knowling hire an illegal. Guess he is miffed the Feds didn't act first.
 
Looks like you are suggesting giving up and just make them legit.

What I would suggest is to open up a realistic path in life you want people who are already here to follow. Whatever one's personal feelings are about illegal immigrants, the reality is that many of them are too settled in here to leave unless they're physically found and forced to leave. Many of them have lived here for decades, have friends and family here, have jobs and places to live here, don't even know anybody in the country they would be deported to, etc. Finding and forcing 10 million people who are trying not to be found is pretty much impossible. Think of times something like that has been tried in history. The Nazis gave up every civil right and spent insane amounts of money to find and capture Jews and they didn't even find 10 million. In Iraq we've only captured a tiny portion of the insurgents despite spending almost a trillion dollars a year trying and having zero civil rights. It would require many trillions of dollars being spent and more or less reducing the whole country to a police state. And all that just to save a miniscule fraction of that money in social services. An approach centered on enforcement just is not realistic.

So, what I think we need to do is to set up some kind of a path that most the illegal immigrants would voluntarily follow. Something like a guest worker program where we could get them paying taxes. That would increase our budget rather than depleating it. Then, you can use enforcement to crack down on anybody who won't follow that path without bankrupting the country.

I believe we can make a change by enacting employer sanction laws, providing States with more local authority dealing with illegals, chaning the law where any vehicle crossing into the US must have US insurance (like Mexico requires to have Mexican insurance).

Employer sanction laws I agree with. Unfortunately AZ shows us why we can't let the states take a larger role. This is a very sensitive topic where civil rights are at stake and it is the responsibility of the federal government to ensure that those rights are not violated. We can't rely on states to respect those rights as AZ has proven. I'm not sure why the insurance idea would help. Wouldn't that only effect the people who are legally crossing the border?

It is interesting Obama wants employers held accountable, yet his administration is taking Arizona to court over a 2007 employer sanction law in which they could loose their license if they knowling hire an illegal. Guess he is miffed the Feds didn't act first.

Well, IMO, AZ has shown that they cannot be trusted to respect people's civil rights, and the most important responsibility of the federal government is to protect our civil rights. The courts have ruled very clearly that states are not permitted to interfere with or extend immigration law:

the regulation of aliens is so intimately blended and intertwined with responsibilities of the national government that where it acts, and the state also acts on the same subject, the act of Congress or treaty is supreme; and the law of the state, though enacted in the exercise of powers not controverted, must yield to it. And where the federal government, in the exercise of its superior authority in this field, has enacted a complete scheme of regulation…. states cannot, inconsistently with the purpose of Congress, conflict or interfere with, curtail or complement, the federal law, or enforce additional or auxiliary regulations.

HINES v. DAVIDOWITZ, 312 U.S. 52 (1941)
 
No. It's not the same. Most the reasons illegal immigrants are a problem are mostly related to them not having legal standing- we have no way to track them, they're afraid to go to the police to report crime, they don't pay taxes, they don't have insurance, etc.

Just listen to what you are saying for a minute. They are illegal because they don't have legal standing. All we have to do is change the laws and then they won't be illegal.

So, getting them paying taxes and on the books solves the problems.

It gets them paying taxes, that is not the same as solving the problem. Don't you think that incentivising the illegals to come here will only increase the likelyhood of creating a revolving door of illegals? This was tried under Reagan and did not work then, there is no reason that it will work now.[/B

You can make it a long and painstaking path to citizenship, much less attractive than the normal legal route, but just refusing to let them into the system to pay taxes makes no sense.

They're not going anywhere no matter what we do, so better to try to eliminate the downsides of having them here.


Tell that to Arizona, they illegals are leaving on their own here.
 
Last edited:
An argument that the problem with illegals being here would be sovled by changing the law so that they are not illegals is the same as saying that if we change the laws so that murder is not a crime then our murder rate will go down. Not sure that that is really addressing the problem at hand.

No, because under current laws, illegals have very few job opportunities. Their best bet is to get a crappy job, get some welfare, and stay out of sight of Uncle Sam. The path sucks, but it's a lot better than where they come from and more practical than going through the byzantine and expensive legal process. I'm not saying that we shouldn't uphold our laws, but making the legal path practical for low income immigrants is the only way to solve the problem.
 
The bulk of unemployed Americans are unskilled. That is what makes this illegal migration from poorer nations so much worse for our citizens.

These poorer people are coming either way. There are millions of people here illegally, and we can't deport them all. Employers who hire then will fly under the radar. They aren't going away. At least let them leave the situation that they're in.
 
No, because under current laws, illegals have very few job opportunities. Their best bet is to get a crappy job, get some welfare, and stay out of sight of Uncle Sam. The path sucks, but it's a lot better than where they come from and more practical than going through the byzantine and expensive legal process. I'm not saying that we shouldn't uphold our laws, but making the legal path practical for low income immigrants is the only way to solve the problem.

Not sure what problem you are trying to fix. Certainly it would not fix people wanting to enter America illegally. It would only encourage many more. There are literally billions of people who live materially worse than what the U.S. calls poor.

Is it the libertarian view that there should be no borders in the world? How about just load up ships from Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and have folks come by the boatload instead of having to walk in the Arizona desert.

BTW, where is the money going to come from when these newly legal citizens ask for their rightful benefits like free health care, food stamps, welfare etc.
 
These poorer people are coming either way. There are millions of people here illegally, and we can't deport them all. Employers who hire then will fly under the radar. They aren't going away. At least let them leave the situation that they're in.

OK set up a guest worker program so they can get fair wages while they work here then go home.
 
Tea:
I would guess that you have little first hand experience living in Arizona. I would bet you have not looked at the 2007 employer law that Arizona passed 3 years ago. Since the law very few have been prosectuted. It forced them to use E-verify and other means to verify that the person is legal to be in the US. Most investigations regarding businesses now catch illegals who have used false or stolen ID's (ID theft).

I didn't say deport all 10-12 million illegals. There are ways to deal with them. My concern is if you make them legit, at what point do you say no more. We have over 1000 illegals entering AZ daily. Do they also get a pass on the law? At some time we have to say enough is enough. I do believe the issue is: What do we do with the long term illegals, what do we do with the ones that have illegally entered recenty, and border security.

It is a shame you feel AZ is not a good state and tends towards discrimination. Its a shame we have places that turn their back on Federal laws regarding immigration. At least AZ is trying to do something. Why don't you come to AZ and look at the situation first hand, do a little reseach, instead of relying on newspaper spin.

Can you explain to me why California ignores for the most part 834b of the CA law.

AZ 2007 employer law for your enjoyment
http://www.ailadownloads.org/advo/ArizonaHB2779.pdf

Yes, its being reviewed by the SC even though the 9th circuit found it to be within the law.
 
Last edited:
Not sure what problem you are trying to fix.

The huddled masses coming in and costing the taxpayers billions.

Certainly it would not fix people wanting to enter America illegally. It would only encourage many more. There are literally billions of people who live materially worse than what the U.S. calls poor.

By making a legal path practical, and with the increased opportunity of citizenship, the numbers of illegals would drop. I specifically called for upholding our laws in the post you quoted. I don't really have a problem with employers who break the law, but it's only a partial solution.

Is it the libertarian view that there should be no borders in the world? How about just load up ships from Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and have folks come by the boatload instead of having to walk in the Arizona desert.

When did "making it practical for more people to immigrate legally" turn into no borders?

BTW, where is the money going to come from when these newly legal citizens ask for their rightful benefits like free health care, food stamps, welfare etc.

Welfare is another debate, but with US citizenship comes far greater opportunity. Many will be able to rise or have their children rise up.
 
Typical of extreme leftist/socialist and those who hate the Tea Partiers too. People working to protect these undeserving assclowns who should be placed at the southern Mexican border so they can get a rifle butt in the face like the other folks crossing that border. I think the answer is to place the US Army at the border and machine gun down the bastards who try to cross illegally, including the Mexican army. You'll see in about two days a sudden attitude change at the border. You probably won't see anyone within a ****ing mile of the border for fear of getting killed. I'm getting fed up with the bull**** down there.
Um...you ARE aware of the Posse Comitatus law, arent you? It's ILLEGAL to move the army onto our borders.
 
OK set up a guest worker program so they can get fair wages while they work here then go home.

We certainly need a better visa system, but this doesn't fix the problem of those who want to stay. I can also see the government screwing this up horribly.
 
The huddled masses coming in and costing the taxpayers billions.
Your solution would do the opposite


By making a legal path practical, and with the increased opportunity of citizenship, the numbers of illegals would drop. I specifically called for upholding our laws in the post you quoted. I don't really have a problem with employers who break the law, but it's only a partial solution.
Isn't the reality that this would encourage more people to break the law and sneak into the country. I really miss your logic here.



When did "making it practical for more people to immigrate legally" turn into no borders?
Is there going to be some magical date when people who sneak in don't have a path to citizenship? I think the last date was 1987 when we did this last time.



Welfare is another debate, but with US citizenship comes far greater opportunity. Many will be able to rise or have their children rise up.

US citizenship comes with a ton of goodies that we can't really afford for the people who are rightful citizens. By adding these folks you will have to subtract more from current citizens to get our fiscal house in order. Why is this never addressed.
 
US citizenship comes with a ton of goodies that we can't really afford for the people who are rightful citizens. By adding these folks you will have to subtract more from current citizens to get our fiscal house in order. Why is this never addressed.

I've addressed this point numerous times. With more citizens, you allow them to rise up economically. They have more job opportunities. More citizens, means more consumers and producers. Keeping legal immigration difficult doesn't decrease immigration, it only makes much of it go underground. causing far more harm to society.
 
Nicely done, couldn't have said it better myself. If OP was really concerned about our economy we'd welcome these undocumented workers and the economic contributions they bring with them. Prohibition didn't work for alcohol and guess what, it isn't working for immigration either. Open up the borders, let them come in and work legally, that way we can document them and regulate them to get rid of the few bad apples. A better question is why would anyone in their right minds make an argument against letting people into this country who only want to do an honest days work? Threads like this expose the people who oppose free immigration for the xenophobes and racists they often are (and those that aren't racist are just woefully misguided).
I guess we can also through out the rule of law and our sovereignty, this country can not afford to assimilate the amount of immigrants that would flood this into country, hell we can afford it now. This country is broke and jobs are becoming scarce, so with the hundreds of thousands flooding in perhaps millions, what will they do?
 
I would guess that you have little first hand experience living in Arizona.

I live in CA. We have about half again as many illegal immigrants here per capita as AZ does. I know much better than somebody from AZ what impact illegal immigration does, and doesn't, have on a state.

But, I'm not unaware of what is going on in AZ on a personal level either. One of my better friends lives in Nogales. She was born and raised there, her parents were both legally naturalized before she was born. She went to college at Georgetown and works now as a high paid consultant. She has a baby she is raising with her husband and she is just the nicest, shyest, person you could ever meet. But, she is hispanic and has a hispanic accent. She gets pulled over at least once every month for nothing at all, treated like a criminal, searched, and interogated. She has a driver's license, but she has been brought in to the jail and locked up twice in the past year because the cop claimed not to believe her ID was real. I saw her get interogated and harrassed for being hispanic first hand when I went down there for her wedding. That is a serious, serious, problem when stuff like that is going on. It's a blatant violation of the civil rights act and the 14th amendment, and it is absolutely unacceptable morally.

My concern is if you make them legit, at what point do you say no more. We have over 1000 illegals entering AZ daily. Do they also get a pass on the law?

Yeah, that is a legitimate concern. That's why I am not saying that we shouldn't have enforcement. We should have enforcement. But, a solution that is primarily focused on enforcement will fail, where a solution that provides reasonable options for the people already here will succeed.

Also, I think there is a perception that there are massive throngs of people trying to get into the country and that if we opened up a guest worker program their numbers would explode. That doesn't seem to really be the case. The number of illegal immigrants in the US has declined for 3 years in a row now. More illegal immigrants are choosing to move away than choose to move to here.

A guest worker program doesn't need to be a whole lot more attractive than the options they have currently. Yes, it would mean they don't have to look over their shoulders every day, which would be nice for them, but it also means they need to start paying taxes.

It is a shame you feel AZ is not a good state and tends towards discrimination.

Well, first off, we aren't talking about AZ as a whole. The only group of people that has a majority favoring 1070 in AZ is white Republicans. Support for 1070 amongst hispanics, blacks, and democrats are all 10% or lower in AZ. But, yeah, it's pretty hard to deny that white Republicans in AZ are tending towards discimination. It's not just the laws that deal with illegal immigrants either. They're passing a rash of anti-hispanic laws- the law about firing teachers with accents, the law banning cultural studies course, the new bill they are proposing to deny birth certificates to kids born here if their parents were illegal imigrants, english only laws, etc.

The hispanic population in AZ is increasing, and pretty quickly, but 90% of those hispanics are here legally. That kind of a demographic change always causes backlash. But that doesn't make it right. States just plain are not allowed to try to manage the racial makeup of their population. That is what AZ is trying to do and they're having to try to sneak their way around the 14th amendment and the civil rights act to do it. That needs to stop before we can possibly talk about any kind of increased enforcement of immigration law.
 
Tea:
Pretty bold to say you know "much better than somebody from AZ what impact illegal immigration does", especially since CA is pretty much a sanctuary State.

You show your racist side by not providing a link to your stats and claiming its just whites republicans that are pushing it. It shows you know very little about Arizona.
70% of Arizona Voters Favor New State Measure Cracking Down On Illegal Immigration - Rasmussen Reports™

Noticed you didn't respond as to why CA does not enforce its own laws (834b) or does very little.

As far as AZ dancing around the 14th amendment, Have the people who entered the US illegally broken federal law? Simple yes or no. They have. AZ law is no more racists than the federal law requiring non citizens to carry ID,..


Sorry about your friend, but there is no way to prove if it is entirely true.
 
Pretty bold to say you know "much better than somebody from AZ what impact illegal immigration does", especially since CA is pretty much a sanctuary State.

We have many more illegal immigrants per capita as AZ, and 10 times as many overall, but we have been dealing with that situation for literally 120 years. Back in the last 1800s or so, CA suddenly became like 30% Asian. Our first response was very much like what AZ is doing now. We panicked about losing our cultural integrity, all kinds of horrible lies and exagerations about problems caused by Asians went around, and we issued a whole slew of anti-Asian laws. For example, they passed a law against men wearing pony tails because lots of asian immigrants wore pony tails and they used it to harrass and lock up asian men arbitrarily, they passed a law against more than one person sleeping in a room who was not married under the pretense that it was to bust up opium dens, but in reality they just used it to do raids on the houses of asians who were too poor to have houses with one bedroom per person, there was a huge wave of hysteria about the notion that asian men were routinely raping white women, which was wildly untrue, but nonetheless the public bought into it. There were all kinds of laws against speaking Chinese... We conducted all sorts of raids and set up business licensing requirements that in practice were used to prevent asians from owning businesses, etc. But it was a total disaster that went on for like 30 years. Tons of oppression, tons of people hurt for no good reason, commerce messed up, civil rights violated, tons of expense, communities being pushed into conflict for no reason... And it didn't have any positive effect. Crime didn't go down, the economy was hurt instead of helped, etc.

So, we eventually learned our lesson and over time we came to a much better way to deal with diversity. Now we try to be as tolerant as we can, to error on the side of being welcoming and open rather than oppressive or closed. And it has paid off a billion times over. Our tech and pharma companies are driven by the ingenuity of immigrants who would rather live here than some place that didn't feel so welcoming to their culture. Our median income is $10k higher than that of AZ and immigrants are a huge part of the reason. It's a place that is capable even of absorbing 2.4 million illegal immigrants without really experiencing any problems. We don't do big raids on communities because we think they have illegal immigrants in them, we don't deport people just for petty stuff, we pride ourselves on our multi-lingual public schools... People here in SF all have to enter a lottery to try to get into one of the multi-lingual schools because the kids that graduate from them consistently smash the graduates of other schools for test scores... I know it probably doesn't seem intuitive, but it really is true- embracing diversity as completely as you can is a far better way to go in every respect. Part of that is sanctuary city policies, but the more important things are schools that embrace multiple languages, things like cultural studies courses, strict policies against anything that even resembles racial profiling, etc.

You show your racist side by not providing a link to your stats and claiming its just whites republicans that are pushing it. It shows you know very little about Arizona.

I didn't just make that up... It's actual polling data. This is just a poll of Arizona residents, not national:

QUESTION: Arizona now requires anyone passing through or living in their state to carry papers proving citizenship that can be produced at the command of any law enforcement officers. Do you approve or disapprove of this requirement?

Approve-
Republican 85%
White 58%
Democrat 10%
Hispanic 9%
Black 4%

Daily Kos :: State of the Nation

Sorry about your friend, but there is no way to prove if it is entirely true.

It is entirely true, but keep in mind that she lives in Nogales. 3/4 of the city is in Mexico, 1/4 on the US side. Her house is like 5 minutes from the border. I do not imagine it is that bad across the whole state.
 
Last edited:
So what? The vast majority of "average voters" are ignorant on the subject of immigration in general. Why does the opinion of people who have the wrong information matter?

Why would your opinion matter? I doubt you can prove you are more/less informed than anyone else. Keep CA politics in CA, we will do the same in AZ. Problem solved.
 
Why would your opinion matter? I doubt you can prove you are more/less informed than anyone else. Keep CA politics in CA, we will do the same in AZ. Problem solved.

For most kinds of issues, I actually agree with that. But civil rights is not one of those issues. Civil rights are clearly set up by our constitution to be consistent nationwide, and it is clearly the responsibility of the federal government to ensure that they are protected no matter what state you are in. Historically, that has turned out to be a very important principle in US history and not one I would consider shifting on.
 
Back
Top Bottom