- Joined
- Feb 16, 2013
- Messages
- 1,543
- Reaction score
- 680
- Location
- East Coast USA
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Got through about the first minute before the stupid hurt too much
Hell, I stopped at the headline.
Why Women DESTROY NATIONS * / CIVILIZATIONS
i think that men have already done a wonderful job of that, but variety is the spice of life.
nations with a good amount of female influence
like where?
Like Europe and the US.
im sorry i asked
I watched the entire video. Now I need to think on it.
My initial reaction was to dismiss it out of hand as reactionary male chauvinism; but that knee-jerk response in and of itself gave me pause.
I'm not sure if his thesis is correct, but as a student of history with some knowledge and understanding of biology I see some compelling points.
So, I'll withhold final judgement until after I see some rational discussion among the Forum.
I agree it is the fault of men.
im sorry i asked
I watched, or well at least skimmed, the whole vid. Mostly overhyped, at best.
There was one thing that stuck with me, because I've been wondering this for some time... why do liberals, particularly female or gay liberals, tend to be apologists for Islam? To favor welcoming large numbers of Islamist immigrants into their nations, not pressuring them to assimilate, etc.... when Islam typically treats women much like cattle, stones hangs or beheads homosexuals, suppresses free speech and basically is the ANTITHESIS of all things liberal in most nations where devout Islamists hold a majority?
Has liberalism become suicidal?? What's the deal there? Does liberalism think they're going to assimilate and become good tolerant feminist-allies? Sweden, France and Germany argue otherwise..
I watched, or well at least skimmed, the whole vid. Mostly overhyped, at best.
There was one thing that stuck with me, because I've been wondering this for some time... why do liberals, particularly female or gay liberals, tend to be apologists for Islam? To favor welcoming large numbers of Islamist immigrants into their nations, not pressuring them to assimilate, etc.... when Islam typically treats women much like cattle, stones hangs or beheads homosexuals, suppresses free speech and basically is the ANTITHESIS of all things liberal in most nations where devout Islamists hold a majority?
Has liberalism become suicidal?? What's the deal there? Does liberalism think they're going to assimilate and become good tolerant feminist-allies? Sweden, France and Germany argue otherwise..
Watched the first few minutes. His point seems to be that women are more liable to welcome people 'not from the tribe' or to 'switch allegiances'.
Wouldn't that mean that the problem is then not the women, but the 'other tribes'?
In which case, this isn't about about mysogyny, but xenophobia.
Either way, it's fun for the whole family.
I had a much longer response prepared (which I'm sure as a mod you can go read if you want). But I realized that the last few sentences did a great job of summarizing the whole thing, so I've cut out all the rest.
Progressives are opposed to religious discrimination because they believe that to be wrong. They are in favor of welcoming refugees from Muslim nations because they believe that to be right. How many political allies it might gain them or lose them is irrelevant.