politicomind
New member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 2
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
It has been said of the US people that they are upset that the poor get poorer and the rich get richer. Well we are angry because we don't see what is going on.
Rich people as a group in the United States are self-made. 70% of the current billionaires were created by themselves within their own lifetime. This means that the rich tend to be more disciplined, less addicted to something or anything, more dedicated to education, and simply more virtuous. They also have less children and invest a greater percentage of their income. Of course these are all of the things which allowed them to become richer in the first place. The rich on average have one or two children, which means they only produce enough people to replace them statistically.
Now the poor on the other hand, are less intelligent, less disciplined, more likely to be addicted to something, more likely to go to prison, more likely to not invest in education, invest a lower percentage of their income in anything, and tend to have almost twice as many children as wealthy people. Thus, the poor are less disciplined and have more children that they cannot afford, let only barely being able to support themselves, as well they tend to have less healthcare. All of these things tend to make them perpetually poor. A stint in prison would prevent their abiltity to gain high paying jobs, a life long addiction drains their income. Having too many children which saps their time away from getting an education, sap their time away from working overtimes, saps their finances away from investing. All these things make them poorer, which is why they are poor in the first place. They tend to be poor decision makers, more impulsive, and less disciplined and then produced more of themselves, because they cannot resist their sexual impulses, and/or in their drunk cocain stupors they breed with people they never met before, thus producing a child with a father she does not remember so that she cannot get child support from him, let alone even marry him because she doesn't know who he is.
So the rich have two disciplined children, who study, avoid drugs, avoid jail, abstain from sex, grow up get good jobs and have two kid themselves.
While, the poor, have four undisciplined children, who don't study, experiment with drugs, go to jail, have kids they don't know of, or kids without fathers, struggle to find good jobs because of their criminal record, or struggle to keep jobs because of their drug addictions.
Generation one had two weatlhy and two poor. Generation two has two wealthy but four poor. Generation three has two wealthy, but eight poor.
The wealthy are maintaing their populations, but the poor are growing their amount of poor people which further empoverishes them because the poor usually compete for middle income jobs, but the wealthy compete for upper income. now that their are eight poor people striving for the middle income jobs, this competition drives down the wages of the middle income because their are eight poor people now where as there were two just two generations ago, yet the employers realize that they don't have to pay as much if so many are competing against each other.
Whereas, the wealthy have two kids who go to good schools and come out and compete for jobs as investment bankers and stock brokers, which the poor don't have a chance to compete for because they didn't go to college and have criminal records which prevent them from having the jobs anyway. So that poor are competing for walmart shifts, and waitor jobs, but there are so many of them that walmart and restaurants haven't had to increase their pay for a while.
Why be mad that the wealthy do all the right things.
Why instead should be mad at the poor for leading rediculous lives and then complaining about it to the wealthy. If the poor could just gain discipline have less kids and snort less drugs, they would start to gain momentum, but each year they display their lack of discipline is a year they get poorer.
It does seem to be quite a paradox of the human experience that undisciplined people who overspend money, undisciplined people who abuse drugs, and undisciplined people who have criminal tendencies, cannot discipline themselve to have less children. The Nature of the Human Population is to produce more criminals than to produce more virtuous people, because criminals can't control their libidos, anymore than they can control their urge to steal.
Rich people as a group in the United States are self-made. 70% of the current billionaires were created by themselves within their own lifetime. This means that the rich tend to be more disciplined, less addicted to something or anything, more dedicated to education, and simply more virtuous. They also have less children and invest a greater percentage of their income. Of course these are all of the things which allowed them to become richer in the first place. The rich on average have one or two children, which means they only produce enough people to replace them statistically.
Now the poor on the other hand, are less intelligent, less disciplined, more likely to be addicted to something, more likely to go to prison, more likely to not invest in education, invest a lower percentage of their income in anything, and tend to have almost twice as many children as wealthy people. Thus, the poor are less disciplined and have more children that they cannot afford, let only barely being able to support themselves, as well they tend to have less healthcare. All of these things tend to make them perpetually poor. A stint in prison would prevent their abiltity to gain high paying jobs, a life long addiction drains their income. Having too many children which saps their time away from getting an education, sap their time away from working overtimes, saps their finances away from investing. All these things make them poorer, which is why they are poor in the first place. They tend to be poor decision makers, more impulsive, and less disciplined and then produced more of themselves, because they cannot resist their sexual impulses, and/or in their drunk cocain stupors they breed with people they never met before, thus producing a child with a father she does not remember so that she cannot get child support from him, let alone even marry him because she doesn't know who he is.
So the rich have two disciplined children, who study, avoid drugs, avoid jail, abstain from sex, grow up get good jobs and have two kid themselves.
While, the poor, have four undisciplined children, who don't study, experiment with drugs, go to jail, have kids they don't know of, or kids without fathers, struggle to find good jobs because of their criminal record, or struggle to keep jobs because of their drug addictions.
Generation one had two weatlhy and two poor. Generation two has two wealthy but four poor. Generation three has two wealthy, but eight poor.
The wealthy are maintaing their populations, but the poor are growing their amount of poor people which further empoverishes them because the poor usually compete for middle income jobs, but the wealthy compete for upper income. now that their are eight poor people striving for the middle income jobs, this competition drives down the wages of the middle income because their are eight poor people now where as there were two just two generations ago, yet the employers realize that they don't have to pay as much if so many are competing against each other.
Whereas, the wealthy have two kids who go to good schools and come out and compete for jobs as investment bankers and stock brokers, which the poor don't have a chance to compete for because they didn't go to college and have criminal records which prevent them from having the jobs anyway. So that poor are competing for walmart shifts, and waitor jobs, but there are so many of them that walmart and restaurants haven't had to increase their pay for a while.
Why be mad that the wealthy do all the right things.
Why instead should be mad at the poor for leading rediculous lives and then complaining about it to the wealthy. If the poor could just gain discipline have less kids and snort less drugs, they would start to gain momentum, but each year they display their lack of discipline is a year they get poorer.
It does seem to be quite a paradox of the human experience that undisciplined people who overspend money, undisciplined people who abuse drugs, and undisciplined people who have criminal tendencies, cannot discipline themselve to have less children. The Nature of the Human Population is to produce more criminals than to produce more virtuous people, because criminals can't control their libidos, anymore than they can control their urge to steal.