- Joined
- Mar 27, 2014
- Messages
- 63,577
- Reaction score
- 33,583
- Location
- Tennessee
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The topic is selectively reporting the news.
And the topic is the USAG not releasing information for the News to report.
Here's the topic: "Why isn’t the assassination attempt on Donald Trump bigger news?" There are other threads, plural, on the Orlando shooting and related
And the topic is the slippery slope of news censorship, whether by news organizations themselves or Government.
Who "censored" news of this so-called "assassination" attempt? It was duly reported. I guess you prefer it was reported on the hour every hour for a few days. That's not 'censorship.'
We have several examples of this WH editing to remove embarrassing statements ... and coincidentally, one involved removing mention of "Islamic Terrorism" by the French President!
All the examples are pretty clear and if you're not aware of them then it looks like your news sources may have indulged themselves in some of that self censorship.
You may like the idea of Government (or friendly news outlets) censorship because you like what they choose to censor, but they won't be around forever.
Can you rely on a different Administration to make the same Jasper-friendly choices of what you're entitled to know?
There's a thread for this: http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...es-transcripts-orlando-terrorists-w-40-a.html
If you have any evidence this "assassination" attempt was censored by anyone, please let us know! Otherwise we simply disagree about the wisdom of making martyrs out of these morons, which is what they want, the goal. IMO, a simple, "Incompetent moron was arrested today trying to take gun from police officer. Idiot alleges he was trying to assassinate Mr. Trump." is sufficient unless he's part of some group or something. But if you want the news to make him a hero to other malcontents, that's your opinion and I strongly disagree.