I didn't say she did. I simplly told her to keep in mind that people choose to get pregnant for future discussion's sake.In the context of her argument, she didn't call for abortion to be covered by insurance. So red herring.
I didn't say she did. I simplly told her to keep in mind that people choose to get pregnant for future discussion's sake.In the context of her argument, she didn't call for abortion to be covered by insurance. So red herring.
If you want to claim that others have no right to something, they equally they can claim that you have no religious rights. To keep your own rights, means allowing others to have their own rights to decisions you don't agree with. Otherwise the one who wishes to control others' lives, will find their life controlled.I don't support either.
Outside of medical issues, people who choose to get pregnant rarely do anything to alter that.I didn't say she did. I simplly told her to keep in mind that people choose to get pregnant for future discussion's sake.
Such as been said of every religion in the world as well. What's your point?It corrupts the minds of those taking part in it, for one.
How does gay sex corrupt a person's mind, especially a gay person?It corrupts the minds of those taking part in it, for one.
What's irresponsible about gay sex?
Here in the civilized world we don't need that garbage. Backwards superstitions and religious doctrine encroaching in people's medical choices is not appropriate in a republic.Where I'm from the strict requirements that are set for a woman wanting this done are general for all. It's not an individual doctor's choice.
Proof of that please?It corrupts the minds of those taking part in it, for one.
Not this specific story, but I have heard from women personally who have had this issue, and run across multiple such stories online. Now, I'm suspect that any laws quoted are either no longer valid or are technically valid, but rarely enforced. But it is still a fight for women to get such procedures, especially young and/or childless.
This is what happens when conservative men, who see us only as baby makers, get to have a say into our medical and reproductive decisions. This scenario is very common.
Is Snopes good enough for you?
What Are the Requirements for Women Seeking to 'Get Their Tubes Tied'?
An online image highlights the "paternalistic" treatment some women face when they seek tubal ligations.www.snopes.com
I have yet to hear of a case where a man, trans or cis, has been denied a tubal ligation or a hysterotomy, due to the above reasons. Thus it still seems to be a woman only problem.Excuse me, men can get pregnant to. I find this post very transphobic and not an indication of sexism as it also applies to men who are transmen.
Keep in mind that women are saying that even other women do not get a say in any individual's reproductive decisions. Furthermore, I can't think of a single transman that would want to have a say in a woman's reproductive decisions. Such a man only wants a say in his own reproductive decisions. Do you examples of a transman believing otherwise?If men can get pregnant, which I believe is your position, then men should have a say in pregnancy and related reproductive decisions, conservative or not.
Keep in mind that women are saying that even other women do not get a say in any individual's reproductive decisions. Furthermore, I can't think of a single transman that would want to have a say in a woman's reproductive decisions. Such a man only wants a say in his own reproductive decisions. Do you examples of a transman believing otherwise?
You are conflating two different things. The men that Lisa is referring to are trying to control other people's reproductive decisions, not their own. Show me men who can get pregnant trying to control reproductive choice of others besides themselves.transmen are men* who have female reproductive systems. Of course men should get a say in female reproduction policies and laws as men can get pregnant and seek abortions, etc. Every man has the right to get pregnant and keep his unborn child.
*assuming you ignore over 1,000 years of language and every dictionary in the world.
The use of the term "gay" for homosexuals also ignores over 1,000 years of language. Language changes and evolves. Get used to it.*assuming you ignore over 1,000 years of language and every dictionary in the world.
This board isn’t your personal twitter page.View attachment 67299982
I saw the above on FB, and I have to wonder how such laws are still in effect given RvW. The ruling in RvW did not limit itself to abortion (and hence why this is not in the abortion section), but stated that all medical decisions were between a person and their doctor.
Now I understand that there have been several federal level rulings that make such laws unconstitutional, but they are not universal such as abortion laws being unconstitutional are. Where is the fight for this, ladies? Why is there such a big fuss if someone tries to limit abortion, but nowhere near a riot for these types of laws?
Your point being?This board isn’t your personal twitter page.
I think it varies from state to state. Here in Maryland the only requirement is the age of 21. In my opinion it should be 18.This is what happens when conservative men, who see us only as baby makers, get to have a say into our medical and reproductive decisions. This scenario is very common.
Is Snopes good enough for you?
What Are the Requirements for Women Seeking to 'Get Their Tubes Tied'?
An online image highlights the "paternalistic" treatment some women face when they seek tubal ligations.www.snopes.com
I care as much about the crap women have to deal with as they care about about the crap men have to deal with. When women start defending mens rights i will defend theirs too. In the mean time, fight your own battles just like you expect us too. Equsl rights and all that, right!!!!View attachment 67299982
I saw the above on FB, and I have to wonder how such laws are still in effect given RvW. The ruling in RvW did not limit itself to abortion (and hence why this is not in the abortion section), but stated that all medical decisions were between a person and their doctor.
Now I understand that there have been several federal level rulings that make such laws unconstitutional, but they are not universal such as abortion laws being unconstitutional are. Where is the fight for this, ladies? Why is there such a big fuss if someone tries to limit abortion, but nowhere near a riot for these types of laws?
Are you writing this under the assumption that I am a woman?I care as much about the crap women have to deal with as they care about about the crap men have to deal with. When women start defending mens rights i will defend theirs too. In the mean time, fight your own battles just like you expect us too. Equsl rights and all that, right!!!!