- Joined
- Jan 2, 2013
- Messages
- 19,259
- Reaction score
- 6,899
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Well the question in the OP is rhetorical. It' s because JAMA is being run by liberals. JAMA isn't at over the top liberal as the scientific journals like NAture, and the scientific organizations like the AAS,but it's pretty obvious they are.
As I've brilliantly and famously stated before, a kid could make a fortune selling Hillary : fightin for us bumper stickers in the NAture ( and apparently JAMA) parking lot.
Obama is not a scientist. JAMA shouldn't pretend he is - LA Times
"...r more troubling is the president’s tone, which is often self-congratulatory. “I am proud of the policy changes in the [Affordable Care Act],” he writes, “and the progress that has been made toward a more affordable, high-quality, and accessible healthcare system.”
It would be difficult, if not impossible, to find another paper in any scientific journal in which a politician was allowed to subjectively analyze his own policy and declare it a success. This is a textbook definition of conflict of interest."
Liberals: making decent people vomit for decades.LOL
As I've brilliantly and famously stated before, a kid could make a fortune selling Hillary : fightin for us bumper stickers in the NAture ( and apparently JAMA) parking lot.
Obama is not a scientist. JAMA shouldn't pretend he is - LA Times
"...r more troubling is the president’s tone, which is often self-congratulatory. “I am proud of the policy changes in the [Affordable Care Act],” he writes, “and the progress that has been made toward a more affordable, high-quality, and accessible healthcare system.”
It would be difficult, if not impossible, to find another paper in any scientific journal in which a politician was allowed to subjectively analyze his own policy and declare it a success. This is a textbook definition of conflict of interest."
Liberals: making decent people vomit for decades.LOL