• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Is CDC Trying to Put a Mask on Your Face Again?

Yet, Trump holds more sway with the conservative voters at this point in time then McCarthy. Go figure.
The thing is, once he gets to the general, you have to have some sway with ALL kinds of voters, not just conservatives.
 
sheep-with-masks.jpg
 
Despite leading an attempt to overthrow our elected government as President, Donald Trump today is the recognized leader of the Republican Party, and countless Republicans -- many already in government -- are seeking his endorsement. Trump is the leading Republican candidate for the Presidency in 2024.

It is unlikely that forum Republicans will respond to the issues of this post. How do we know something is seriously wrong? The complete silence by Republicans on the issues.
There was no response from Republicans. They remain silent concerning what their party is doing.

Why?
 
Are you as convinced of that as you were about Trump's second term 'victory'?
Even the American left is coming to the realization that the House of Reps will go to the GOP in November. Anyone who still doubts that is an idiot. A net gain of 5 seats will put the GOP in charge. And they stand to gain far more. As for my confidence in Trump winning in 2020, that confidence was dependent on a fair election. A pandemic porn motivated rush to mass mailout balloting blew that up.
 
I agree that it’s not a sure thing.

Two important points;
1. Trump’s sway is diminishing.
2. Trump’s sway with his base doesn’t equate to nearly as much influence in D.C. as you might think.

You don’t have to believe in something for it to be true.

I’m far from being a Pelosi fan, but I won’t deny the fact that she, like a number of other longtime elected officials, has a far better grasp of our federal government systems, national and international policies, and the dynamics involved in gaining the most for her party and our country.

Seriously, have you ever considered just how complicated achieving and maintaining positions of significant authority and influence in our (any, really) federal government?

She does bring in a crapload of money for her party. All part of knowing how to stay on top.

No. Reality.
Have you ever listened to Pelosi on the radio? She sounds either drunk or cognitively declined. And she has not been making rational decisions in the last couple years. And she does not know shit about foreign policy, she never has. In either case, in all likelihood, she will not occupy the position of "speaker of the house" after late January.
 
Have you ever listened to Pelosi on the radio? She sounds either drunk or cognitively declined.
Pelosi’s tendency towards babbling has increased in recent years.
And she has not been making rational decisions in the last couple years.
Examples?
And she does not know shit about foreign policy, she never has.
Nonsense. Pelosi knows far more about, and has far more experience in foreign policy than most politicians in D.C., and 10,000% more than Loser #45.
In either case, in all likelihood, she will not occupy the position of "speaker of the house" after late January.
If Pelosi keeps her word, she will not be Speaker after next January, regardless of the midterm election results.
 
Pelosi’s tendency towards babbling has increased in recent years.

Examples?

Nonsense. Pelosi knows far more about, and has far more experience in foreign policy than most politicians in D.C., and 10,000% more than Loser #45.

If Pelosi keeps her word, she will not be Speaker after next January, regardless of the midterm election results.
1651775601269.png
 
Why does the Center for Disease Control want to control the spread of disease??? this sounds like fascism to me.
That’s because you believe their BS
 
Good luck with that. I don’t know anyone who would comply.

Would you?

——

If CDC concludes that a mandatory order remains necessary for the public’s health after that assessment, the Department of Justice will appeal the district court’s decision.”

What’s this about? The plaintiff Health Freedom Defense Fund issued a sharp statement:

Your source is less than credible, to put it mildly.

These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.



  • Overall, we rate the Brownstone Institute Right Biased based on editorial positions that favor a conservative-libertarian perspective. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a failed fact check and the promotion of misinformation regarding Covid-19.
I still wear a mask in grocery stores and such.
 
Nonsense. Pelosi knows far more about, and has far more experience in foreign policy than most politicians in D.C., and 10,000% more than Loser #45.
Tell me where you think Pelosi gained any foreign Policy experience. Taking congressional junkets abroad is not foreign policy experience. It's just travel on the taxpayers dime. Trump as president at least had advisors and cabinet members with loads of actual foreign policy experiance.
If Pelosi keeps her word, she will not be Speaker after next January, regardless of the midterm election results.
Pelosi's word is worth a dog's bowel movement.
 
Tell me where you think Pelosi gained any foreign Policy experience. Taking congressional junkets abroad is not foreign policy experience.
35 years in Congress, ranking member of the Intelligence Committee, House Minority Leader, House Whip, and 2X House Speaker.

Your ridiculous claim is dismissed.
It's just travel on the taxpayers dime.
Speaking of massive wasteful travel expenses …
Trump as president at least had advisors and cabinet members with loads of actual foreign policy experiance.
And yet, he rarely listened, preferring instead to dazzle the world with his complete incompetence.
Pelosi's word is worth a dog's bowel movement.
She is a politician, so ….
 
Have you ever listened to Pelosi on the radio? She sounds either drunk or cognitively declined. And she has not been making rational decisions in the last couple years. And she does not know shit about foreign policy, she never has. In either case, in all likelihood, she will not occupy the position of "speaker of the house" after late January.

And yet Pelosi wiped the floor with Trump when he was president. An old woman put him in his place and an old man whipped him in an election.
 
Even the American left is coming to the realization that the House of Reps will go to the GOP in November. Anyone who still doubts that is an idiot. A net gain of 5 seats will put the GOP in charge. And they stand to gain far more. As for my confidence in Trump winning in 2020, that confidence was dependent on a fair election. A pandemic porn motivated rush to mass mailout balloting blew that up.
Every single agency tasked with investigating allegations of fraud-including Trump's own commission-concluded that the election was fair. During 2016 Trump never missed an opportunity to accuse the election process of being 'rigged'. You didn't hear a word about rigging or fraud once he got the job as the result of the 'fraudulent' election. Interesting, no? :ROFLMAO:
 
Every single agency tasked with investigating allegations of fraud-including Trump's own commission-concluded that the election was fair. During 2016 Trump never missed an opportunity to accuse the election process of being 'rigged'. You didn't hear a word about rigging or fraud once he got the job as the result of the 'fraudulent' election. Interesting, no? :ROFLMAO:
Unsecure mass mailout balloting and ballot harvesting qualify as fraud even if it cannot be prosecuted. The election was rigged.
 
And yet Pelosi wiped the floor with Trump when he was president. An old woman put him in his place and an old man whipped him in an election.
Your worship of the old woman is cute, however she did not wipe the floor with anyone or whip him in an election. She did preside over two sham impeachments based on nothing but narratives. In the long run she is handing the majority status of the House of Reps to the GOP just like she did in 2010.
 
35 years in Congress, ranking member of the Intelligence Committee, House Minority Leader, House Whip, and 2X House Speaker.

Your ridiculous claim is dismissed.
35 years in the House of Reps does not count as foreign policy experience, in no way shape or form. She is a legislator. Foreign policy is run in the executive branch.
And yet, he rarely listened, preferring instead to dazzle the world with his complete incompetence.
Sounds like TDS on your part.
 
Unsecure mass mailout balloting and ballot harvesting qualify as fraud even if it cannot be prosecuted. The election was rigged.
Please show evidence of systemic unsecured voting.
I.e. fraud.
Thanks.
 
35 years in the House of Reps does not count as foreign policy experience, in no way shape or form. She is a legislator. Foreign policy is run in the executive branch.
Your understanding of Congress’ role is sadly limited.

Foreign policy is initiated and implemented by the president however, Congressional approval is needed for spending, and consent is required for finalizing of trade agreements.

On numerous occasions Congress has supported and/or prevented presidents from implementing their foreign policy by authorizing or refusing funding.

A recent example of Congress’ role in foreign policy was it’s authorization of a $400M military aid package to Ukraine that Trump illegally delayed.

Then there’s Congress’ sole authority to declare war on foreign nations.
Sounds like TDS on your part.
It would seem so to a Trumpster.
 
Back
Top Bottom