- Joined
- May 21, 2005
- Messages
- 8,227
- Reaction score
- 7,460
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I've noticed that many people who are against abortion make exceptions in the case of rape or incest. Maybe I'm missing something, but this seems like a hypocritical position to take. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Incest can result in deformation of the fetus, but if that makes abortion "okay", then it should also be "okay" to abort any fetus that's going to be born deformed.
Rape can result in unwanted pregnancy. Unlike careless sex, rape is never the mother's fault. But it's not the fetus' fault, either. If you care about the mother's feelings, and don't want to force her to have a "constant reminder" of the incident, then that makes abortion okay? If that's the case, abortion should be okay for any woman who gets pregnant by an abusive, dominating husband or boyfriend, so they don't have a "constant reminder" of the abuse.
Why support a woman's right to choose only for certain circumstances by which she got pregnant? Does anyone who holds this belief care to explain their rationale?
Incest can result in deformation of the fetus, but if that makes abortion "okay", then it should also be "okay" to abort any fetus that's going to be born deformed.
Rape can result in unwanted pregnancy. Unlike careless sex, rape is never the mother's fault. But it's not the fetus' fault, either. If you care about the mother's feelings, and don't want to force her to have a "constant reminder" of the incident, then that makes abortion okay? If that's the case, abortion should be okay for any woman who gets pregnant by an abusive, dominating husband or boyfriend, so they don't have a "constant reminder" of the abuse.
Why support a woman's right to choose only for certain circumstances by which she got pregnant? Does anyone who holds this belief care to explain their rationale?