• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Is ABC Lying About Trump's Stance On Pre-Existing Conditions?

Why Is ABC Lying About Trump's Position On Pre-Existing Conditions?

  • ABC Was Unaware Of Trump's Position

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • ABC Is Purposely Trying To Mislead The American Public

    Votes: 9 100.0%
  • ABC Was Intentionally Trying To Fool Trump Into Arguing Against The Pre-Existing Condition Guarantee

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9
Greenbeard, you are now lying.

Read carefully.

Trump OPPOSES THE ACA but he WILL PRESERVE THE PRE-EXISTING CONDITION GUARANTEE IN THE NEW PLAN

If you continue posting over and over that there is no pre-existing condition guarantee without the ACA, you are committing intentional fraud.
He's had four years to come up with a new plan. So far, not jack shit.
 
Twump cant bare to admit Obama did a good thing.
 
He's had four years to come up with a new plan. So far, not jack shit.
Well, he's rolling out a series of EOs, in conjunction with Azar. To guarantee that pre-existing conditions will be covered, before the ACA is potentially repealed.

ABC lied.

 
Well, he's rolling out a series of EOs, in conjunction with Azar. To guarantee that pre-existing conditions will be covered, before the ACA is potentially repealed.

ABC lied.
EOs are worthless in this instance. You can't make insurance companies cover people with pre-existing conditions with an EO. Would never stand up in court.
 
EOs are worthless in this instance. You can't make insurance companies cover people with pre-existing conditions with an EO. Would never stand up in court.
Read the CNBC article. And Azar's statements about the EOs.

HHS will work with Congress to make sure legislation is passed covering pre-existing conditions, before the ACA is potentially repealed.

This is the extent of what Trump can do, given that he cannot draft a bill.
 
Read the CNBC article. And Azar's statements about the EOs.

HHS will work with Congress to make sure legislation is passed covering pre-existing conditions, before the ACA is potentially repealed.

This is the extent of what Trump can do, given that he cannot draft a bill.
Good luck!
 
This is the extent of what Trump can do, given that he cannot draft a bill.

He can stop asking the Supreme Court to bring back pre-existing conditions and instead defend the pre-existing condition protections in court.

Actively trying to bring back pre-existing conditions is lunacy.
 
The Republican argument is that IF people with pre-existing conditions are able to pay for their treatments, they need to. The cost of their treatment doesn’t magically disappear with socialized medicine. It gets shifted to the premiums, deductibles, and co-pays of working class Americans who have to buy their own insurance.
And the rest of us see the problem with someone trying to pay thousands, tens of thousands in medical costs, each visit in some cases simply because you had to change insurance. It's a good argument for UHC.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom