Why has the SCOTUS leak Source not been Identified?

[jnug]

They don't know.

And probably are not trying very hard.

 

[Acadia]

Or where is Maxwells customer list? The ones who like to be entertained by her underage girls.

She better hope the cameras keep working wherever she is.

 

[Gateman_Wen]

lol so are you accusing her of doing a 4d chess maneuver? or are you saying the left fell to a 4d chess manuever? lol

none of the above. I'm saying she made a transparent move to force the other conservative "justices" hand.

A "4d chess" maneuver would be a bit harder to figure out, much less recognize don't you think? Besides, conservative brains barely work in 3 dimensions, you can't expect them to handle 4.

 

[DarkWizard12]

none of the above. I'm saying she made a transparent move to force the other conservative "justices" hand.

to.....vote left? The leak was the majority opinion at the time. Lol what exactly would she have gained?

A "4d chess" maneuver would be a bit harder to figure out, much less recognize don't you think? Besides, conservative brains barely work in 3 dimensions, you can't expect them to handle 4.

idk man, it seems you all accuse conservatives of working secretly against you, but then insist that we are too dumb to do so at the same time.

 

[eohrnberger]

"Why has the SCOTUS leak Source not been Identified?"

Because the leaker served the left's political purposes and is therefore protected by corrupt DC bureaucratic swamp, which also includes FBI / DOJ and DC courts.

Had the leaker been conservative, had the issue decision been in favor of the left's politics, he'd have been already been found, declared a threat to the US democracy, criminally charged, and held without bail until trial, same as the 1/6 rioters.

Thanks to the bifurcated criminal justice system along political lines the left has instituted. The US is far closer to a banana republic than anyone realizes or cares to realize.

 

[BlueTex]

"Why has the SCOTUS leak Source not been Identified?"

Because the leaker served the left's political purposes and is therefore protected by corrupt DC bureaucratic swamp, which also includes FBI / DOJ and DC courts.

Had the leaker been conservative, had the issue decision been in favor of the left's politics, he'd have been already been found, declared a threat to the US democracy, criminally charged, and held without bail until trial, same as the 1/6 rioters.

Thanks to the bifurcated criminal justice system along political lines the left has instituted. The US is far closer to a banana republic than anyone realizes or cares to realize.

Charged with what?

What law was broken?

 

[Airyaman]

"Why has the SCOTUS leak Source not been Identified?"

Because the leaker served the left's political purposes and is therefore protected by corrupt DC bureaucratic swamp, which also includes FBI / DOJ and DC courts.

Had the leaker been conservative, had the issue decision been in favor of the left's politics, he'd have been already been found, declared a threat to the US democracy, criminally charged, and held without bail until trial, same as the 1/6 rioters.

Thanks to the bifurcated criminal justice system along political lines the left has instituted. The US is far closer to a banana republic than anyone realizes or cares to realize.

 

[mike2810]

The Biden pukes and the media will just continue to ignore the leaker and hope people forget about it. And even if they don't, even if people keep asking questions, they will ignore the questions.

The leaker and the leak served their purposes.

Can't we rely on OAN, NewsMax, Hannity, or Carlson to report the news on who was the leaker?
Maybe zerohedge will step up and provide the answer.

 

[WorldWatcher]

"Why has the SCOTUS leak Source not been Identified?"

Because the leaker served the left's political purposes and is therefore protected by corrupt DC bureaucratic swamp, which also includes FBI / DOJ and DC courts.

Actually because the leaker served the right's political purposes.

Some of Justices on the right side of the aisle may have been waffling. In other words upholding the 15 week ban but not overturning Roe. To prevent their defection a conservative with access leaked the draft opinion to lock in their support. Once the draft was released it was basically impossible for a Justice to change their opinion.

WW

 

[Mycroft]

Can't we rely on OAN, NewsMax, Hannity, or Carlson to report the news on who was the leaker?
Maybe zerohedge will step up and provide the answer.

How are they going to find out who it is?

 

[Mycroft]

Actually because the leaker served the right's political purposes.

Some of Justices on the right side of the aisle may have been waffling. In other words upholding the 15 week ban but not overturning Roe. To prevent their defection a conservative with access leaked the draft opinion to lock in their support. Once the draft was released it was basically impossible for a Justice to change their opinion.

WW

Yeah...that's one conspiracy theory that I've heard before.

 

[IQ57]

none of the above. I'm saying she made a transparent move to force the other conservative "justices" hand.

A "4d chess" maneuver would be a bit harder to figure out, much less recognize don't you think? Besides, conservative brains barely work in 3 dimensions, you can't expect them to handle 4.

Projection, insults and ad hom.

Self reflection helps.

When was the gateman ever “there”?

I approve more of the wellerman.

 

[Gateman_Wen]

Projection, insults and ad hom.

Self reflection helps.

YOu are ignoring most of the post because you are offended that I have a low opinion of general conservative intelligence.

I get it, it's ok.

 

[mike2810]

How are they going to find out who it is?

investigate?

 

[WorldWatcher]

The drafts should be distributed with Canary Traps.

WW

 

[SCrider]

And I’ll save some the trouble.

“They don’t know is not an acceptable answer”

What say you then?

Because reveling the leaker does not benefit those in charge of the court these days.

 

[SCrider]

"Why has the SCOTUS leak Source not been Identified?"

Because the leaker served the left's political purposes and is therefore protected by corrupt DC bureaucratic swamp, which also includes FBI / DOJ and DC courts.

Had the leaker been conservative, had the issue decision been in favor of the left's politics, he'd have been already been found, declared a threat to the US democracy, criminally charged, and held without bail until trial, same as the 1/6 rioters.

Thanks to the bifurcated criminal justice system along political lines the left has instituted. The US is far closer to a banana republic than anyone realizes or cares to realize.

How did the leak serve the left in any way? The RW aholes did what they were hired to do.

 

[SCrider]

How are they going to find out who it is?

Because none of those have an integrity, so they can blame whom ever they want.

 

[WorldWatcher]

How did the leak serve the left in any way? The RW aholes did what they were hired to do.

It didn't it served the right. It moved the release of the information that the SCOTUS was going to overturn Roe farther way from the mid-terms. It would have been more useful to the left, in terms of donation and driving voters, to have the information release as close as possible to the election.

WW

 

[IQ57]

Because none of those have an integrity, so they can blame whom ever they want.

It didn't it served the right. It moved the release of the information that the SCOTUS was going to overturn Roe farther way from the mid-terms. It would have been more useful to the left, in terms of donation and driving voters, to have the information release as close as possible to the election.

WW

 

[IQ57]

How did the leak serve the left in any way? The RW aholes did what they were hired to do.

 

[SCrider]

It didn't it served the right. It moved the release of the information that the SCOTUS was going to overturn Roe farther way from the mid-terms. It would have been more useful to the left, in terms of donation and driving voters, to have the information release as close as possible to the election.

WW

If I was to put money on it, I'd say it came from Thomas's staff. He is now the defacto leader of the RW court, and has no integrity what so ever.

 

[Liberal7360]

And I’ll save some the trouble.

“They don’t know is not an acceptable answer”

What say you then?

That is easy to answer.

If it was someone from one of the liberal judges we would have known who it was by now.

If it was from one of the conservative judges, we will never be told who the leaker was.

 

[VySky]

That is easy to answer.

If it was someone from one of the liberal judges we would have known who it was by now.

If it was from one of the conservative judges, we will never be told who the leaker was.

That’s unfortunate. And I want to see every name on G Maxwells client list.

 

[eohrnberger]

Actually because the leaker served the right's political purposes.

Some of Justices on the right side of the aisle may have been waffling. In other words upholding the 15 week ban but not overturning Roe. To prevent their defection a conservative with access leaked the draft opinion to lock in their support. Once the draft was released it was basically impossible for a Justice to change their opinion.

WW

Yeah...that's one conspiracy theory that I've heard before.

Exactly.

How did the leak serve the left in any way? The RW aholes did what they were hired to do.

Who made more political hay out of the issue? Conversates? Nope.

The RW aholes did what they were hired to do.

Left wing aholes protesting outside SCOTUS justice's private homes in violation of federal law:

18 U.S. Code § 1503 - Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1503​

(a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.​

​

(b) The punishment for an offense under this section is—​

​

(1) in the case of a killing, the punishment provided in sections 1111 and 1112;​

​

(2) in the case of an attempted killing, or a case in which the offense was committed against a petit juror and in which a class A or B felony was charged, imprisonment for not more than 20 years, a fine under this title, or both; and​

​

(3) in any other case, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, a fine under this title, or both.​

​

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 769; Pub. L. 97–291, § 4(c), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1253; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60016, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1974, 2147; Pub. L. 104–214, § 1(3), Oct. 1, 1996, 110 Stat. 3017.)​

Which the politicized DOJ refuse to enforce.