- Joined
- Apr 6, 2019
- Messages
- 2,395
- Reaction score
- 122
- Location
- Ireland
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Israel's status as a nuclear power is extortionate on the rest of the world no matter their committment to democracy. Having a huge population like France doesn't guarantee that they'll be moral but it does ensure that their political system is somewhat balanced through economies of scale. A small country is less potent but can still have more volatile moods than a large country. A larger country is more spiritually and socially connected along the lines of their cultural beliefs. For example the larger gatherings within Spanish Catholicism will always be more transcendent than Irish Catholicism.
Secondly Israel has to be resistant to Holocaust denials and must respond to such racism in an angry rather than violent way. Israel would only end up undermining the merciful reputation of Judaism after the Holocaust by being very vengeful to Palestine. Nothing could atone for the horror of the Holocaust. Yet if we wanted to be pedantic then the German prisoners of war could have been imprisoned much longer or subjected to house arrest. Whatever happened the ringleaders were fully prosecuted with the other soldiers eventually being forgiven. The trouble with the Nuremberg death penalties is that they gave an extreme punishment to the worst offenders while neglectfully letting many of the accomplices off the hook. Hence the death penalty can give an illusion of justice even in genocidal trials where it might be justified. Anyway most German soldiers were indirectly punished through the decades of poverty after the war. The awful war rapes in East Germany by Russian soldiers and the bombings in Dresden only emphasise that many Germans were also sincere victims. The abandoned Israeli plot to poison a German city would not only have scapegoated civilians but would also have been grossly disproportionate to the fact that they'd already surrendered and were held in loose captivity. Israel must accept that the decisions to release German POW's after a year was either a forgiving act by the Jews or an apathetic response by the allies. The historical past cannot be changed and maintaining a sense of rage is no longer appropriate when Palestine is bearing the brunt of it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakam
Secondly Israel has to be resistant to Holocaust denials and must respond to such racism in an angry rather than violent way. Israel would only end up undermining the merciful reputation of Judaism after the Holocaust by being very vengeful to Palestine. Nothing could atone for the horror of the Holocaust. Yet if we wanted to be pedantic then the German prisoners of war could have been imprisoned much longer or subjected to house arrest. Whatever happened the ringleaders were fully prosecuted with the other soldiers eventually being forgiven. The trouble with the Nuremberg death penalties is that they gave an extreme punishment to the worst offenders while neglectfully letting many of the accomplices off the hook. Hence the death penalty can give an illusion of justice even in genocidal trials where it might be justified. Anyway most German soldiers were indirectly punished through the decades of poverty after the war. The awful war rapes in East Germany by Russian soldiers and the bombings in Dresden only emphasise that many Germans were also sincere victims. The abandoned Israeli plot to poison a German city would not only have scapegoated civilians but would also have been grossly disproportionate to the fact that they'd already surrendered and were held in loose captivity. Israel must accept that the decisions to release German POW's after a year was either a forgiving act by the Jews or an apathetic response by the allies. The historical past cannot be changed and maintaining a sense of rage is no longer appropriate when Palestine is bearing the brunt of it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakam
Last edited: