hah :mrgreen:He was hit by a bullet?
or kennedy..........Racist hate filled white guy was racist and hate filled?
A more provocative question would be why was Malcom X killed?
He was assassinated because he was a high-profile black man who fought for equality.l want to discuss it .vote please ,thanks..
Goodness. A rather significant segment of the white population had no intention of giving blacks equality? I didn't know that.MLK was killed during a time of racial turmoil, where blacks were daring to demand equality and a rather significant segment of the white population had no intention to give that to them. Assassinating opposition leaders, be they presidents, presidential candidates, or civil rights leaders, was a quick way to deal with the situation. I'm frankly surprised that more black civil rights leaders weren't murdered during the chaos of those days.
leaders like Mlk wouldnt have to fight for it if they hadGoodness. A rather significant segment of the white population had no intention of giving blacks equality? I didn't know that.
What would be considered a "significant segement"?leaders like Mlk wouldnt have to fight for it if they had
Hi Medusa !!l want to discuss it .vote please ,thanks..
large major etc..What would be considered a "significant segement"?
l am sure.Hi Medusa !!
James Earl Ray had an opportuntiy to shoot and he didn't miss.
I believe he did it on his own but who knows.
So "significant segment" means the large majority of whites had no intention of giving blacks equality?large major etc..
So "significant segment" means the large majority of whites had no intention of giving blacks equality?
I don't think it has to be a "large majority" to be a significant segment. I don't think there's any question that there was a significant segment that did not want to see equal rights for black people. I don't like that that's true but there's no use splitting hairs or denying it.So "significant segment" means the large majority of whites had no intention of giving blacks equality?
Well, it seems to me, laws found in Southern States required them to take action. Whites made up the majority of the population in other states across the United States.if not why did blacks has to fight for this equality ?
So you believe the appauling action of the Birmingham Police and Fire Department means the majority of whites in the US were opposed to equality for Blacks?you know how the birmingham police and fire department responded to what was a peaceful protest march in 1963? they brought out high pressure fire hoses.
View attachment 67153155
no. but a small group of vfocal anatics can overrule the opinion of the moderate majority into silence.So you believe the appauling action of the Birmingham Police and Fire Department means the majority of whites in the US were opposed to equality for Blacks?
No use splitting hairs? Well, I suppose that would be true to those who are trying to project a certain narrative.I don't think it has to be a "large majority" to be a significant segment. I don't think there's any question that there was a significant segment that did not want to see equal rights for black people. I don't like that that's true but there's no use splitting hairs or denying it.
True. We've certainly witnessed that over the last few years.no. but a small group of vfocal anatics can overrule the opinion of the moderate majority into silence.