galenrox said:
But then there's the issue of us making more people willing to commit these acts of terrorism. In middle eastern society, from what I can tell, they teach from a young age that martyrdom is the most honorable thing one can do, and thus it doesn't seem like the hardest thing to do to insite a lot of these people to start blowing themselves up, and if we were smart about this **** we'd be walking on eggshells around the middle east, instead of this current policy of trying our hardest to come across as a buffall in a china store, which obviously creates more willing terrorists.
No. Absolutely no. The policies of the US in the Mideast had no part in making those people blow themselves up. Imagine no Jewish state in the Mideast ever existing, and it would still be the same. Israel and Iraq are just excuses, and damn it, people are stupid enough to buy them. But the truth is that Islam is programmed for world domination. No Israel or Iraq for Poitiers (717, if I recall correctly) or Vienna (1529, 1683), you know.
Snoozin said:
I agree it is, for *me.* But does that necessarily mean we have to *impose* our way of life on others?
Because our way of life is the only good one. We ended up imposing democracy on the Nazis instead of respecting their culture and moral values. Why is the Islamic world any different?
Islam itself is *not* the enemy.
It most certainly is. I’m a student of Islam, I’m in touch with Islamic scripture and law day by day. Islam isn’t a spiritual system, it’s a political system with a law-code for all facets of life, intended for all of mankind. In Islamic terminology, a land not governed by Islamic law is said to be in a state of
fitnah, meaning rebellion (against God), and must be brought to cease that state, by imposing Islamic law on it.
Islam is the enemy. That’s the truth. Sorry if it hurts, but denial will only worsen the blow the West will receive.
I'm going to assume you are Jewish, and forgive me if I am wrong.
Yes, that’s right.
But we fought long and hard here in the US for the majority white Christian population to have even minimal respect for Jewish people. Under the pretext of multi-culturalism. Was that wrong? Was I wrong to get in all sorts of fights with my parents when they were spewing their filthy anti-semitic cra* all the time? Was I wrong to argue when they mouthed off about black people? Am I wrong when they denigrate all Muslims as terrorists or all Latinos as job-grabbing illegals?
OK, you’re under impression that I oppose multiculturalism. I will clear this up now.
I’m
for multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is good. But … only if all parties agree to play by the rules. For example, the Hindu minority in Britain? No complaints, ’cause they play by the rules. The Sikhs? They play by the rules. Jews, Catholics, atheists, pagans? They all play by the rules.
But the Muslims don’t. They don’t integrate. They form autonomous communities with a law unto themselves. They censor criticism of Islam (viz Rushdie) and they kill apostates from Islam. They respect democracy only to the extent that it lets them implement their religious law, and no further than that. They don’t play by the rules. And since they don’t play by the rules, they shouldn’t be allowed to reap the benefits of multiculturalism. Pure and simple.
Calm2Chaos said:
So a hurricane is our countries fault? We caused this massive hurricane to hit our country?
No, of course not, what do you think I am?! It’s not your fault, it’s just your responsibility to react to it properly, which didn’t happen. I was contrasting to Islamic terrorism, which it isn’t the responsibility of the US to mend something in its ways in order to curb.