• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Did the Obama Administration Leak the Details of Signals Intercepts

Wehrwolfen

Banned
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
402
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Why Did the Obama Administration Leak the Details of Signals Intercepts Pointing to an Attack Which Is Still Threatened?

—Ace

Marc Ambinder asks a libertarian-flavored question -- why should we trust the government's say-so that Snowden leaked crucial secret information when the government is leaking about Sources and Methods during a lockdown for an anticipated terrorist attack?

Reporters at McClatchky and Eli Lake have reported all about the intelligence that led to the current embassy lockdown.

The intercept provided the U.S. intelligence community with a rare glimpse into how al Qaeda’s leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, manages a global organization that includes affiliates in Africa, the Middle East, and southwest and southeast Asia.
Several news outlets reported Monday on an intercepted communication last week between Zawahiri and Nasser al-Wuhayshi, the leader of al Qaeda’s affiliate based in Yemen. But The Daily Beast has learned that the discussion between the two al Qaeda leaders happened in a conference call that included the leaders or representatives of the top leadership of al Qaeda and its affiliates calling in from different locations, according to three U.S. officials familiar with the intelligence. All told, said one U.S. intelligence official, more than 20 al Qaeda operatives were on the call.​

Gee that really seems like the sort of thing we'd not want Zawahiri to know. But here are people on Team Obama blabbing it out all over the world yet again.


[Excerpt]

Read more:
Ace of Spades HQ

There's a dichotomy Obama and his cronies leak high security information and it methods, while stonewalling and obfuscating information requested by a Congress elected by the people.
 
Why Did the Obama Administration Leak the Details of Signals Intercepts Pointing to an Attack Which Is Still Threatened?

—Ace

Marc Ambinder asks a libertarian-flavored question -- why should we trust the government's say-so that Snowden leaked crucial secret information when the government is leaking about Sources and Methods during a lockdown for an anticipated terrorist attack?

Reporters at McClatchky and Eli Lake have reported all about the intelligence that led to the current embassy lockdown.

The intercept provided the U.S. intelligence community with a rare glimpse into how al Qaeda’s leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, manages a global organization that includes affiliates in Africa, the Middle East, and southwest and southeast Asia.
Several news outlets reported Monday on an intercepted communication last week between Zawahiri and Nasser al-Wuhayshi, the leader of al Qaeda’s affiliate based in Yemen. But The Daily Beast has learned that the discussion between the two al Qaeda leaders happened in a conference call that included the leaders or representatives of the top leadership of al Qaeda and its affiliates calling in from different locations, according to three U.S. officials familiar with the intelligence. All told, said one U.S. intelligence official, more than 20 al Qaeda operatives were on the call.​

Gee that really seems like the sort of thing we'd not want Zawahiri to know. But here are people on Team Obama blabbing it out all over the world yet again.


[Excerpt]

Read more:
Ace of Spades HQ

There's a dichotomy Obama and his cronies leak high security information and it methods, while stonewalling and obfuscating information requested by a Congress elected by the people.

Obama is far more concerned about his poll numbers than he is in doing his job quietly, efficiently and without applause.
 
Back
Top Bottom