- Joined
- Oct 15, 2020
- Messages
- 37,056
- Reaction score
- 18,259
- Location
- Greater Boston Area
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Okay, this article will be dismissed out of hand by many as it’s from The Federalist. And to be fair, this article is almost entirely speculation about what will happen with the ongoing investigation of Hunter Biden. But the article does pose a very important question. Why, after a year and half, does The NY Times suddenly admit its “Russian Disinformation” narrative was (at best) misinformation and now state that it is Hunter’s laptop and those are his messages? Why do it at all knowing the their critics across town at The Post and others across the country would have a field day with their admission of error? The Times easily could have kept quite about it.
IMO, that question alone makes this a very interesting read as it’s entirely possible The NY Times isn’t done trying to spin this story for its readers.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/2...ttempt-to-control-the-hunter-biden-narrative/
IMO, that question alone makes this a very interesting read as it’s entirely possible The NY Times isn’t done trying to spin this story for its readers.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/03/2...ttempt-to-control-the-hunter-biden-narrative/