• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Climate Science is Fallible

Jack Hays

Traveler
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
94,823
Reaction score
28,342
Location
Williamsburg, Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
[h=2]Why Climate Science is Fallible[/h] Posted on October 1, 2013 by Anthony Watts
Guest essay by Dr. David Deming
We live in a scientific age. The sciences are viewed as the only real sources of authoritative information. Knowledge derived from other epistemological systems is regarded as having less credibility. The conclusions of philosophy are untestable, and religion is often cynically interpreted as nothing more than superstition and myth. Public policy decisions made upon the basis of scientific recommendations may have economic consequences measured in trillions of dollars. Yet few people realize how unreliable scientific authority can be.
The popular conception is that scientists dispassionately discover truth through a foolproof technique called the scientific method. In some simplistic views, the scientific method reduces to a series of procedural steps analogous to instructions in a cookbook. The results produced by this hypothetical scientific method are verified by something called peer review, a process that allegedly certifies reliability.
But the common understanding of science is largely an ignorant misconception.
Continue reading →
:peace
 
The Global Warming Hoax Explained for Dummies




what these political hack scientist wont tell you man only contributes 5% to the CO2 emersions. so even if CO2 is the only cause of global warming which it is not doesn't even come close man is only responsible for 5% of it. So you global warming nuts explain what the hell you going to do about the other 95%

true science has proven this warming period is natural its only the political hack scientist that are still desperately clinging to the hoax they created to both save face and keep receiving the billions in grants
 
Last edited:
Nobody ever said it was infallible. :confused:
 
The Global Warming Hoax Explained for Dummies




what these political hack scientist wont tell you man only contributes 5% to the CO2 emersions. so even if CO2 is the only cause of global warming which it is not doesn't even come close man is only responsible for 5% of it. So you global warming nuts explain what the hell you going to do about the other 95%

true science has proven this warming period is natural its only the political hack scientist that are still desperately clinging to the hoax they created to both save face and keep receiving the billions in grants


That 5% number is missing a huuuuuuuge piece of the puzzle. If I explain it to you, would you promise to never bring up this hilariously easy to debunk talking point again?

Also, really, one of those computer generated voice videos? Really? Do you have any idea how easy it is to win an argument when you get to decide what the other side says? :lamo
 
That 5% number is missing a huuuuuuuge piece of the puzzle. If I explain it to you, would you promise to never bring up this hilariously easy to debunk talking point again?

Also, really, one of those computer generated voice videos? Really? Do you have any idea how easy it is to win an argument when you get to decide what the other side says? :lamo
will not promise nothing because im right your wrong end of story
you cant say that CO2 is the cause of global warming and man is the biggest contributor of that warming when they only produce 5% of the CO2 emissions it goes against science it goes against logic and it goes against common sense. you might have abandon all that to keep the man made global warming hoax intact in your mind because it is very hard to believe and admit what you have been told all these years have been nothing but lies
 
will not promise nothing because im right your wrong end of story
you cant say that CO2 is the cause of global warming and man is the biggest contributor of that warming when they only produce 5% of the CO2 emissions it goes against science it goes against logic and it goes against common sense. you might have abandon all that to keep the man made global warming hoax intact in your mind because it is very hard to believe and admit what you have been told all these years have been nothing but lies
I can say that, actually. Because of that part you're missing.
 
Back
Top Bottom