Drag is essentially a menstrual show to make fun of women. Different versions of it have appeared all through history.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reference. Given your ID, I then shifted to one of the brothers. All tongue in cheek of course.
Probably because you appear to be conflating all the performances and appearances as the same thing, while failing to show the same stance with non crossdressing highly sexual displays, like professional cheerleader performances.
I am not comprehending the issue/problem/concern. Drag shows are simply men dressing up as women or women dressing up as a men, and being goofy. Where is the "sexualized" part? Sounds like you added "sexualized" part for dramatic effect. Based on my limited knowledge of this, Drag Queen Story Hour is simply a Drag Queen reading children's books to children with parental permission.
There is NO conflation. There no defense for the many of the shows being put on with the prime example being the one that got the hotel in Miami's liquor license yanked, which was the bare minimum that should have occurred, and quite frankly in other circumstances would have resulted in mass arrest of the staff, performers, and parents of the children that attended.
The root of nonsense is based on two principles: (1) Homosexuality and Transgenderism is based on cultural peer pressure, not natural or innate instincts. (2) It is fundamentally wrong to be gay, lesbian, trans, or gender non-conformist. Banning children from hearing about gay people, transgender people, or drag shows is away of stopping the spread of this "societal sickness". What we're seeing on the cultural left is the popular opposite - normalize it within children, and it makes us a safer and more accepting society.
Children were permitted to attend, if their parents came with them. Isn't Florida about parental rights?There is NO conflation. There no defense for the many of the shows being put on with the prime example being the one that got the hotel in Miami's liquor license yanked, which was the bare minimum that should have occurred, and quite frankly in other circumstances would have resulted in mass arrest of the staff, performers, and parents of the children that attended.
DeSantis, Florida agency go after Miami hotel for drag show
Florida's Department of Business and Professional Regulation moved to have a Miami hotel stripped of its liquor license after it provided alcohol to patrons of a Christmas-themed drag show.www.dailymail.co.uk
Are children allowed in strip clubs?
Thank God this disgusting practice was kicked to the curb. The picture on the right is a girl or a groomed trans boy. I’ll tell you what the fuss is about, this is pathetic. Anybody who thinks this is fine is mentally ill.This topic pops up frequently and remains as ridiculous as ever.
Don't freak out, but ALL little boys used to wear dresses and nobody cared!
Up until as recently as the 1940s, it was no big deal for boys to wear dresses and the little dudes happily frocked up!babyology.com.au
In History: Why little boys wore dresses
“No, they didn’t!” The group of third-grade students exclaimed. “Yes, they did. Little boys used to wear dresses,” I said. The group was touring the Pendleton Historical Museum on awww.heraldbulletin.com
Don’t freak out, but ALL little boys used to wear dresses and nobody cared!
Can you even believe that such a fuss is made of boys wearing dresses and skirts? Fact is that up until the early 20th century, little boys wore dresses and gowns well into their preschool years, and often beyond.
Once upon a time, all little boys wore dresses
In Western European countries, boys would be dressed like this until anything from 2 to 8 years old, with some boys documented wearing dresses into the late teens.
“Boys’ dresses were often made in brighter or darker colours and in plainer or stronger fabrics, and might have had chunky belts and trimmings and large metallic buttons, none of which were typical of girls’ dresses,” the V&A Museum of Childhood explains.
“Boys’ dresses were more tailored in appearance, and often had features associated only with clothing for boys, such as the opening down the front of the skirt, fashionable in the 1810s and 1820s.
Why tho?
It’s thought that all young children – boys and girls – wore dresses to make nappy changing and toilet training easier. Some toddler gowns also had practical features, with fabric or ribbon ties sewn to them, as a kind of “lead” to keep them close and support them as they learnt to walk. Dresses were economical and practical, and had plenty of room for growing children (which pants did not!)
Boys were popped into dresses just like girls up until the late 18th century. Then, some little boys began to be dressed in pants or tight “skeleton suits” (above).
However, in the early 19th century boys were back to frocks again, this time as well as the long frocks of earlier years, they also wore shorter ones with matching bloomers. A nod to gentler days, practicality and play, perhaps?!
A few hundred years ago people thought a headache was caused by a possessed gobblin in their brain.
Is this a strip club or a drag show?
Why do you think that is caused by masculinity
What do you think intolerance is?
Because some idiots got mad about it, and now everyone who knows it's not a threat is trolling the shit out of them.
Religion is not law but law is religion.
Interestingly enough that the Nazis were into medical experimentation, just like the modern left is into medical experimentation on children with their mutilations and life-altering and harmful hormone treatments.
*facts
You're the only one talking about Fox News.
It can't be. Laws must be based on morality and beliefs those are fundamental components of religion.
First when you suggest that people in a political grouping are Nazis without being Nazis your post appears emotional and irrational.
Not sure what this means.
Who is they? If disagreement is trolling you have picked the wrong website.
