• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why are Pelosi and Schumer so violently anti wall

LouC said:
You have no evidence either of them has been bought.

:roll:
Click to expand...

Other than the fact they are totally against the wall with very little explanation. Why wont they compromise. What is their real reason.
 
LouC said:
How has this violence manifested itself?
Click to expand...

Haven't you been paying attention? Pelosi became violent when she said "No." It was so violent that Trump had to scurry out of the room.

Here is video evidence of happens when Trump is told "No."

 
Logical1 said:
As crooked as they are, you know if this is true it is in some safe off shore account!!!!!!!!! They certainly are not the first politicians that have been bought.
Click to expand...

Lot of good it is allegedly doing them in some "safe off shore account".

Too funny!

Nancy is 78 years old. Chuck is 68 and still has 4 years left on his current term.

Neither live in mansions. Chuck lives in a Brooklyn apartment. Nancy in a modest (for San Francisco) two story brick home.

What will they do with their Cartel money "safe in off shore accounts"?

Take early retirement?

Travel the world?

They can both do that now paid for in part by the US Government.

I know...they can go to Disneyland!

LOL
 
Stealers Wheel said:
Haven't you been paying attention? Pelosi became violent when she said "No." It was so violent that Trump had to scurry out of the room.

Here is video evidence of happens when Trump is told "No."

Click to expand...


LOL

I love it!
 
A wall reduces the number of potential future Democrats. Simple as that.
 
Saladin4 said:
And the cost...5.7 Billion for that useless piece of ****...No thanks
Click to expand...

Dont worry Mexico will pay in the end somehow, maybe in tacos
 
Logical1 said:
Other than the fact they are totally against the wall with very little explanation. Why wont they compromise. What is their real reason.
Click to expand...

The fact is they have not objected to Trump's campaign promise with "little explanation".

Why won't Fat Donald compromise on his campaign promise? He promised Mexico would pay for his wall, Nancy and Chuck have no need to compromise on what Fat Donald promised that would not cost Taxpayers any money.

Sheesh.

They have stated their reasons.
 
Bullseye said:
A wall reduces the number of potential future Democrats. Simple as that.
Click to expand...

Prove it!

Since it is so "simple".

Since there is no or any pending path to citizenship for illegal aliens in the United States I am looking forward to your proof to your outlandish claim.
 
Bullseye said:
Self-evident to the casual observer.
Click to expand...

All you need to do is admit your claim was fraudulent.

Don't waste our time playing word games trying to cover for the obvious lie.

I am a trained election observer and I know your claim has absolutely no merit, no basis in fact.
 
Bullseye said:
Self-evident to the casual observer.
Click to expand...

Perhaps "self-evident" to the uninformed and Right Wing partisan propagandized "casual observer".

But not to anyone with any sense.
 
LouC said:
Perhaps "self-evident" to the uninformed and Right Wing partisan propagandized "casual observer".

But not to anyone with any sense.
Click to expand...
Ok, so why do YOU think Chuckie and Nan are so vehemently opposed to a few hundred miles of fence?
 
Winston said:
Walls won't stop drugs, have you heard of the art of "smuggling" before?
Click to expand...

Didn't you hear? Pelosi is on the take for the 5% that cross the Rio Grande.
 
Logical1 said:
For them to be on the take is not far fetched at all. It seems to be a democrat trait. Look how Bill and Hillary took 140 million dollars from the Russians "for" the Clinton Foundation. But everyone knows the Clinton Foundation is just a cover, since it really is just the Clinton's piggy bank.
Click to expand...
For your education.

Complex tale involving Hillary Clinton, uranium and Russia resurfaces
https://www.politifact.com/facebook...x-tale-involving-hillary-clinton-uranium-rus/
 
Nancy and Chuck have no reason to be for Fat Donald's campaign promise. Last I checked they were filthy Liberal Democrats and Donald Trump was a fine upstanding Republican.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Bullseye said:
Ok, so why do YOU think Chuckie and Nan are so vehemently opposed to a few hundred miles of fence?
Click to expand...

They never said they were opposed to fencing as needed along the border, or other physical barriers.

They are opposed to Fat Donald demanding American Taxpayers pay for his idiotic campaign promise.

That is because American Citizens aren't Mexican Citizens.
 
LouC said:
Lot of good it is allegedly doing them in some "safe off shore account".

Too funny!

Nancy is 78 years old. Chuck is 68 and still has 4 years left on his current term.

Neither live in mansions. Chuck lives in a Brooklyn apartment. Nancy in a modest (for San Francisco) two story brick home.

What will they do with their Cartel money "safe in off shore accounts"?

Take early retirement?

Travel the world?

They can both do that now paid for in part by the US Government.

I know...they can go to Disneyland!

LOL
Click to expand...

Its called greed.
 
Fat Donald is still totally clueless what he wants built at the border. But he promised Mexico would pay for it. All Nancy need do is ask Fat Donald to show her the $5.7 billion dollar check from Mexico made payable to the United States Government and then she would, after it cleared, be more than happy to add that into the spending bill.

Yes folks, it is just that simple.

:mrgreen:
 
LouC said:
They never said they were opposed to fencing as needed along the border, or other physical barriers.

They are opposed to Fat Donald demanding American Taxpayers pay for his idiotic campaign promise.

That is because American Citizens aren't Mexican Citizens.
Click to expand...
So, whether,we need it or not isn't the point, the goal is to deny Trump an accomplishment at any cost? Seriously?
 
Bullseye said:
So, whether,we need it or not isn't the point, the goal is to deny Trump an accomplishment at any cost? Seriously?
Click to expand...

We don't need to fund Trump's campaign promise.

Especially at $5.7 Billion dollars that he promised Mexico would pay for.

Seriously!

Neither Speaker Nancy Pelosi nor Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer are denying Fat Donald any "accomplishment". They just aren't. He just needs to get the money from Mexico to pay for his wall and he can gloat about his accomplishment all he wants and there would be nothing Nancy or Chuck could do to stop him!

Yes folks, it is that simple!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom