Already disproven earlier in the thread
It also keeps away from society destructive and evil people who would otherwise be here to cause mayhem. For every Ghandi that is born a Mussolini is born. For every Ghandi that is aborted, a Mussolini is aborted. Since you can't prove one way or another which way a born being will go, you are equally birthing or aborting good and evil, contributing and destructive.
Sacred is a subjective value.
Plenty of women with huge warm hearts that have had abortions
Specifically what problems?
What blame is attached to the "victim"?
Plenty of mothers who have had an abortion who have not been destroyed.
Plenty of families that have not been destroyed where the woman has gotten an abortion.
Goddess is just fine with it. It reduces the number born into poverty or abuse.
Except for the two children she already had as mentioned in the post. So no she doesn't have to fend for herself. In fact many women who have abortions also have children at another point in their lives. On the other side of the coin, there is also the possibility that she aborted none of her children and none of them take care of her when she's old, and she still has to fend for herself.
Define abortion survivors. Because if you simply mean anyone who was born because their mother didn't have an abortion that would include all pro-choice people, which means your statement would be a blatant lie. It's most likely just misrepresentative though.
I do believe that you are mistaken. You might want to revisit Exodus 21:22-25. If the woman is injured, it's eye for eye and all that, but the unborn child, effectively aborted by the one who struck her, simple fine. Nowhere near the penalty called for by murder. If it was considered murder then they would have called for the murder penalty.
And yet the state somehow still deprives people of life with the death penalty within both civil and military aspects.
Incorrect. First off all those laws specifically note that they do NOT apply to abortion. If such was as you claimed, then they would specifically note that they do apply to abortion. Secondly, what those laws provide for is not much more than what laws that apply to abuse and mistreatment of animals provide for. And certainly animals are not being given identical rights to that of a born person.