• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Who's a bigger threat Bush or Bush apologists? (1 Viewer)

Who's a bigger threat Bush or Bush apologists?

  • Bush

    Votes: 2 12.5%

  • Bush apologists

    Votes: 8 50.0%

  • Other, explain

    Votes: 6 37.5%
  • Total voters
    16
Billo_Really

Billo_Really

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 6, 2005
Messages
18,930
Reaction score
1,040
Location
HBCA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Who's a bigger threat to this country? George W. Bush? Or the people that constantly make excuses for his behavior and decisions?
 
Maybe.

Maybe not.

I don't know yet.
 
I vote for weak kneed, cheese eating surrender monkeys who hate Bush so much they bend over for the jihadists:mrgreen:
 
Billo_Really said:
Maybe.

Maybe not.

I don't know yet.
Click to expand...

LOL I vote for "maybe"
 
TurtleDude said:
I vote for weak kneed, cheese eating surrender monkeys who hate Bush so much they bend over for the jihadists:mrgreen:
Click to expand...

There is already a thread for them so they don't count. We're talking about Bush and Bush apologists which are just are bad a surrender monkeys.
 
A bigger threat to who??? Liberals?

I'd have to go with the Bush apologists. Bush can't run for re-election but all us so called apologists make up a voting block to be reckoned with!:cool:
 
Originally posted by talloulou
I'd have to go with the Bush apologists. Bush can't run for re-election but all us so called apologists make up a voting block to be reckoned with
Click to expand...
That's the problem. The last thing we need is "vapid" voters!
 
talloulou said:
A bigger threat to who??? Liberals?

I'd have to go with the Bush apologists. Bush can't run for re-election but all us so called apologists make up a voting block to be reckoned with!:cool:
Click to expand...

Ooorah! I can't wait to see the looks on their faces when they (democrats) lose house/senate seats this year. :mrgreen:
 
Billo_Really said:
That's the problem. The last thing we need is "vapid" voters!
Click to expand...

Well I tried to answer what I thought was a silly question with silliness. Unfortunately I agree with you there are too many vapid voters. Vapid voters are what keeps our whole two party system afloat.
 
Donkey1499 said:
Ooorah! I can't wait to see the looks on their faces when they (democrats) lose house/senate seats this year. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...


***Yeah, and by all the recent signs--the dems better get used to staying the loser party. Its the national defense and the economy, stupid! LMAO!
 
Originally Posted by talloulou
Well I tried to answer what I thought was a silly question with silliness. Unfortunately I agree with you there are too many vapid voters. Vapid voters are what keeps our whole two party system afloat.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure if that's a good thing. We should have more choices than that. And I will venture to guess, you feel the same way.
 
Billo_Really said:
I'm not sure if that's a good thing. We should have more choices than that. And I will venture to guess, you feel the same way.
Click to expand...

I'd love to see a revolution where the whole two party system is tossed out the window unfortunately those who are in control do a pretty good job at keeping us distracted. At this point I kind of view the "president" as a public relations mask so the real rulers of the universe can do their bidding behind closed doors. So I just vote for the "mask" that appeals to me personally all the while knowing it doesn't really make much of a difference either way.
 
Originally Posted by talloulou
I'd love to see a revolution where the whole two party system is tossed out the window unfortunately those who are in control do a pretty good job at keeping us distracted. At this point I kind of view the "president" as a public relations mask so the real rulers of the universe can do their bidding behind closed doors. So I just vote for the "mask" that appeals to me personally all the while knowing it doesn't really make much of a difference either way.
Click to expand...
Does this problem have a solution?
 
Billo_Really said:
Does this problem have a solution?
Click to expand...

Oh I have no idea. In the long run it's most likely irrelevant as eventually I believe we will probably end up globally under one world government. I have no idea if this will happen in my lifetime but I think there's a great shot of it coming to fruition in my childrens lifetime. Globalization has made the world smaller and many of problems we face currently stem from the fact that you can't have pockets of the world that aren't caught up with the rest of the civilized world. Not when the world is such a small populated place. As nations who were once behind play catch up by sending more and more of our jobs overseas we will become less of a superpower and things will start to even out. People are going to feel alot of "growing pains" during this process but in the end I think it's inevitable. I'm not sure personally if a "new world order" so to speak is bad but its certainly something that won't be easily accepted by many. But more and more people are adapting and seem content enough with Big Brother guiding and molding them.

As far as the "presidential elections" here in the US I honestly don't believe it's possible for someone completely outside of the whole "game" to be elected. And while you'll hear people complaining about politics it's mostly "water cooler" complaining. The fact is most US citizens are relatively content and a content population is the easiest type of population to control.

One of the reasons the middle east is such a mess is that those people aren't easily distracted and they are far from content which makes them a force to be reckoned with.
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
The French??? lol
Click to expand...
You ***, I spewed beer on my monitor. :rofl
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
The French??? lol
Click to expand...


surrender monkeys can come in American and French versions. The latter has more culture and less personal hygiene
 
Originally Posted by TurtleDude
I vote for weak kneed, cheese eating surrender monkeys who hate Bush so much they bend over for the jihadists
Click to expand...
What the hell are you doing staring at monkeys when their bending over?
 
Billo_Really said:
What the hell are you doing staring at monkeys when their bending over?
Click to expand...


you must do that-I sure don't. of course when I am lining them up through a Leopold Mark IV you can see the details clearly :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
 
Originally Posted by TurtleDude
you must do that-I sure don't. of course when I am lining them up through a Leopold Mark IV you can see the details clearly
Click to expand...
You mean like this?

turtledudeym0.jpg
 
Billo_Really said:
You mean like this?

turtledudeym0.jpg
Click to expand...


what kind of moron goes on a quail field with a cheap piece of glass like that? do you know how hard it is to hit a flying quail (or even a drunk lawyer) with a rifle?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom