- Joined
- Jul 2, 2014
- Messages
- 21,022
- Reaction score
- 3,209
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Not if one is astute enough to understand my post.
I've seen your act, dont bother talking down to me.
Not if one is astute enough to understand my post.
I've seen your act, dont bother talking down to me.
God, since he created it so that only people with a uterus get pregnant.This whole forum keeps saying that men have no choice in whether their children are aborted.
Who wrote this law?
If you feel you are being spoken down to, that is on you.
My post was clear. Anyone should be able to understand.
But not by themselves.God, since he created it so that only people with a uterus get pregnant.
No, its on you. You talk down to everybody.
At the expense of the woman's choices. But what does that have to do with the here & now?Believe it or not, men did have choices before you were born.
So? Only the woman's body suffers the ravages of pregnancy and childbirth.But not by themselves.
In truth, we are all responsible for our own feeling. This is a fact, not conjecture.
An example, did you ever notice that people with nice cars, homes, better home audio, expensive wines... are called arrogant by the folks that don't have those things?
Think about it.
He doesn't anymore.What does one have to do with the other?
By the way, there was a time when a man had to have his wife's permission to get a vascectomy.
Fortunately, we're in more modern times where one's autonomy means not requiring permission from another.What does one have to do with the other?
By the way, there was a time when a man had to have his wife's permission to get a vascectomy.
So? The woman has to deal with pregnancy and childbirth by herself.But not by themselves.
If they are called arrogant its not because they have nice things, its because they are arrogant.
So? The woman has to deal with pregnancy and childbirth by herself.
So? The woman has to deal with pregnancy and childbirth by herself.
Not what I have observed. Not what psychology tells us.
I happen to see it differently.
Is the family pregnat too? Even if she has family, she still have total and final say. She does not need anyone's approval or permission to continue a pregnancy or not, family included.If she has no family, yes.
Not sure what is confusing about this.
Even if she has family, she still have total and final say. She does not need anyone's approval or permission to continue a pregnancy or not, family included.
That sounds rather misogynistic.If she does its her own fault.
Apparently you did, as you felt it was necessary to include family for some reason. It doesnt really make a difference if she has a family or not.Why are you telling me this?
Do you think I miss the obvious?
Opinion is acceptable in the absence of fact, not in conflict with it.
Something to consider, you may quote me.
Apparently you did, as you felt it was necessary to include family for some reason. It doesnt really make a difference if she has a family or not.
It sounds rather realistic if you ask me.That sounds rather misogynistic.
And you have no valid rebuttal to offer. GoodbyeOk, you have no clue what I wrote, why or too who.
Go away.
Thanks