Sound criteria. :roll:Captain America said:She's just Bush's lap dog (who happens to be able to spit watermelon seeds between her teeth.)
I, for one, do not believe that a single word ever spoken from her mouth publicly, has ever had any direct contact with a thought generated within her head. That's what I mean by lapdog. If she had the integrity needed for a seat in the oval office she would have bailed on Bush a long time ago like Powell did. Instead, she prefers to roll over, beg, and sometimes play dead. Like any good lapdog would.aquapub said:I'll wait for some rational criticisms of Condi to emerge before getting into this one.
I think you give Hillery too much credit. I can think of several good republicans that I would support over Hillery. Heck, for that matter, I could think of several McDonald's cashiers I could support over Hillery.:roll:aquapub said:Condi would win hands down. But no other Republican could beat Hillary.
I think the closer one gets to Bush the harder their chance of election will be. Condi needs to distance herself from Bush like most of the rest of the party is doing if she even thinks she has a chance.galenrox said:Man, I've heard rumors, only rumors mind you, that Cheney'll step down due to "health problems" in 2007, and he'll be replaced by Rice, to the purpose of making her a more viable candidate in '08.
Anywho, in reality, it'll take a really great republican or democrat candidate to get me to not vote libertarian, but if the only options were Hillary and Condi, I'd pick Condi.