• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who were the cruelest colonizers?

Who were the cruelest colonizers?

  • Portuguese

    Votes: 2 11.8%
  • Spanish

    Votes: 5 29.4%
  • English

    Votes: 5 29.4%
  • Germans

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • Belgians

    Votes: 8 47.1%
  • Japanese

    Votes: 6 35.3%
  • Italians

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Russians

    Votes: 2 11.8%
  • Turks

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 17.6%

  • Total voters
    17

swing_voter

DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
13,042
Reaction score
8,463
Location
'Murica
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Independent
Portuguese
Spanish
English
Germans
French
Belgians
Japanese
Italians
Russians
Turks
Other

(choose all that apply)
 
The West wasn't won with peyote parties on the plains.
 
The Spanish were inadvertently (and in some cases on purpose but mostly by accident) devastating to the people of South America by bringing in diseases that almost wiped them out.

It's hard to say though as you have to judge each Empire by the standards of the time.
 
The Spanish were inadvertently (and in some cases on purpose but mostly by accident) devastating to the people of South America by bringing in diseases that almost wiped them out.

It's hard to say though as you have to judge each Empire by the standards of the time.


Many scientists believe Europe got syphilis from Latin America so its a wash.


.
 
The Belgians top the list but the Germans, French and British weren't far behind. Japanese were horrible to the Chinese and Koreans. They still treat Koreans like second class citizens.
 
Many scientists believe Europe got syphilis from Latin America so its a wash.


.
I think they got it from sheep long before there was a Latin America.
 
The Dutch are missing from the list of options.
 
Portuguese
Spanish
English
Germans
French
Belgians
Japanese
Italians
Russians
Turks
Other

(choose all that apply)
Japanese, hands down.
 
Why are American colonizers missing on the list?
England colonized the New World, American didn't. America was created after the colonization happened.
 
English. Just by volume. Not only half the world, but Scotland Wales and Ireland too.
 
Of course, I do not know.

But I have read that the Belgians in the Congo certainly were pretty close to "winning" that title.
 
Why are American colonizers missing on the list?
Probably for the same reason all the various aboriginal tribes that killed slaughtered and often ate their opponents while they took their possessions and women arent on there. Same as the reasons why the numerous African tribes arent on there.

Why didnt you piss yourself over those groups not being included like you did the 'Americans'?
 
We didn't colonize. We annexed.
 
Probably for the same reason all the various aboriginal tribes that killed slaughtered and often ate their opponents while they took their possessions and women arent on there. Same as the reasons why the numerous African tribes arent on there.

Why didnt you piss yourself over those groups not being included like you did the 'Americans'?

Which tribes did that?
 
Probably for the same reason all the various aboriginal tribes that killed slaughtered and often ate their opponents while they took their possessions and women arent on there. Same as the reasons why the numerous African tribes arent on there.

Why didnt you piss yourself over those groups not being included like you did the 'Americans'?
Typical VanceMack racist post, not surprising. 🤡
 
English, for sheer volume.


However, I heard the Mongolians weren't very nice...but are they colonizers, or conquerors? And...ultimately, is there a difference?
 
Typical VanceMack racist post, not surprising. 🤡
:ROFLMAO:

Yes...I know facts have a tendency to kick 'people' like you squarely in the balls. DOnt worry...you can still go on with your self loathing while you ignore history.

Its ****ing tragic how many of you 'people' engage in hysteria and struggle when it comes to history.
 
All of 'em. They all colonized/annexed the indigenous peoples.
 
Probably for the same reason all the various aboriginal tribes that killed slaughtered and often ate their opponents while they took their possessions and women arent on there. Same as the reasons why the numerous African tribes arent on there.

Why didnt you piss yourself over those groups not being included like you did the 'Americans'?

The Belgians slaughtered twenty million in the Congo. No Native American or African tribe even remotely came close to inflicting that much suffering and chaos.
 
Back
Top Bottom