• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who still trusts the CDC?

Do you still trust the CDC for honest information on COVID?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
When the CDC began recommending general mask wearing in public places on April 3, 2020, in fact, it emphasized the risk of asymptomatic transmission. But this was not a newly discovered risk. It had been known for months that the mean COVID-19 incubation period was five or six days, and there had been several reports indicating that a substantial share of people infected by the virus never develop symptoms, meaning that carriers who did not feel sick could still spread the virus.


That advice is consistent with what Fauci was saying publicly in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. "There's no reason to be walking around with a mask," he said during a March 8, 2020, interview with 60 Minutes.
So, the advice he was giving on March 8th 60 minutes interview, was given months after Fauci knew that Covid19 can be asymptomatically spread. If his advice was, the mask was helpful on an infected person, to limit spread to an uninfected person, and he knew that you could be infected and not know it, why did he tell Sylvia Burwell she wouldn't need a mask on an airplane? Why did he say on March 8th that "There's no reason to be walking around with a mask,"? Then he went on to support mask mandates. He's a politically motivated bureaucrat. He's been exposed through FOIA documents and will probably face indictments for his gain of function and origin of Sars-covid-Cov-2 lies.


And the prattle goes on.

Fauci didn't lie about masks...m
 
When the CDC began recommending general mask wearing in public places on April 3, 2020, in fact, it emphasized the risk of asymptomatic transmission. But this was not a newly discovered risk. It had been known for months that the mean COVID-19 incubation period was five or six days, and there had been several reports indicating that a substantial share of people infected by the virus never develop symptoms, meaning that carriers who did not feel sick could still spread the virus.


That advice is consistent with what Fauci was saying publicly in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. "There's no reason to be walking around with a mask," he said during a March 8, 2020, interview with 60 Minutes.
So, the advice he was giving on March 8th 60 minutes interview, was given months after Fauci knew that Covid19 can be asymptomatically spread. If his advice was, the mask was helpful on an infected person, to limit spread to an uninfected person, and he knew that you could be infected and not know it, why did he tell Sylvia Burwell she wouldn't need a mask on an airplane? Why did he say on March 8th that "There's no reason to be walking around with a mask,"? Then he went on to support mask mandates. He's a politically motivated bureaucrat. He's been exposed through FOIA documents and will probably face indictments for his gain of function and origin of Sars-covid-Cov-2 lies.

Well, the first one isn't saying what you said is said, and the second one is the NY Post, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch.. Enough said.
 
You can't be that naive. J.Edgar Hoover, Gordon Liddy, Eric Holder, Betsy DeVoss...and the list goes on. Political appointees are "unconnected with any party"?? Seriously? 🤣
The Hoovers , Liddys, Holders and DeVoss' of this world can make work at an agency difficult to accomplish and/or unpleasant to deal with for a while but they cannot override the agencies basic mandate nor how it functions. They cannot throw the workers out of jobs. They cannot meddle in the agency's daily functioning. Their appointments are often simply political payoffs and their jobs honorary. The Civil Service makes and enforces the rules agencies are run by and they do not change from one administration to another. Can appointed heads leave their mark; to some extent but it is not permanent.

The appointed heads of agencies are temporary. They are not "the government" unless you consider the political parties "the government". Do you?
 
Last edited:
Someone asks...

Do you still trust the CDC for honest information on COVID?​

There is little doubt the CDC updates their recommendations as per their most recent findings, so yes, I do. So is there any honest information circulating this board that suggests Ivermectin is more effective than a mere covid vaccine?
 
Hell NO!!

I don't Trust the CDC.

Not anymore...

Not after this shit...

I Trust YOU!
 
I would put my trust in the CDC before putting trust in the Tide Pod King
 
Fifty states having to manage diseases on their own, with no effective central coordination.
exactly......and it doesn't take much thought to see that within a small amount of time the states would be clamoring for help from Uncle Sam
 
Back
Top Bottom