- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 26,629
- Reaction score
- 6,661
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
This is a political theory discussion, but I am looking towards practical application. Mods move if you see fit.
Who should justice serve: the victim, society, or the unjust (criminal if you will)? When I ask this question I am thinking about who deserves the most justice if someone commits a crime with a victim? There is discussion about how rehabilitation is important. But in a case such as rape, or murder, how important is it that the Victim sees that justice is carried out? And how far does justice for the victim go? What about justice for society? And what about justice for the criminal? How far do you see these goings?
And in our system do you think we serve them? How far for each?
This is a political theory discussion, but I am looking towards practical application. Mods move if you see fit.
Who should justice serve: the victim, society, or the unjust (criminal if you will)? When I ask this question I am thinking about who deserves the most justice if someone commits a crime with a victim? There is discussion about how rehabilitation is important. But in a case such as rape, or murder, how important is it that the Victim sees that justice is carried out? And how far does justice for the victim go? What about justice for society? And what about justice for the criminal? How far do you see these goings?
And in our system do you think we serve them? How far for each?
This is a political theory discussion, but I am looking towards practical application. Mods move if you see fit.
Who should justice serve: the victim, society, or the unjust (criminal if you will)? When I ask this question I am thinking about who deserves the most justice if someone commits a crime with a victim? There is discussion about how rehabilitation is important. But in a case such as rape, or murder, how important is it that the Victim sees that justice is carried out? And how far does justice for the victim go? What about justice for society? And what about justice for the criminal? How far do you see these goings?
And in our system do you think we serve them? How far for each?
This is a political theory discussion, but I am looking towards practical application. Mods move if you see fit.
Who should justice serve: the victim, society, or the unjust (criminal if you will)? When I ask this question I am thinking about who deserves the most justice if someone commits a crime with a victim? There is discussion about how rehabilitation is important. But in a case such as rape, or murder, how important is it that the Victim sees that justice is carried out? And how far does justice for the victim go? What about justice for society? And what about justice for the criminal? How far do you see these goings?
And in our system do you think we serve them? How far for each?
This is a political theory discussion, but I am looking towards practical application. Mods move if you see fit.
Who should justice serve: the victim, society, or the unjust (criminal if you will)? When I ask this question I am thinking about who deserves the most justice if someone commits a crime with a victim? There is discussion about how rehabilitation is important. But in a case such as rape, or murder, how important is it that the Victim sees that justice is carried out? And how far does justice for the victim go? What about justice for society? And what about justice for the criminal? How far do you see these goings?
And in our system do you think we serve them? How far for each?
This is a political theory discussion, but I am looking towards practical application. Mods move if you see fit.
Who should justice serve: the victim, society, or the unjust (criminal if you will)? When I ask this question I am thinking about who deserves the most justice if someone commits a crime with a victim? There is discussion about how rehabilitation is important. But in a case such as rape, or murder, how important is it that the Victim sees that justice is carried out? And how far does justice for the victim go? What about justice for society? And what about justice for the criminal? How far do you see these goings?
And in our system do you think we serve them? How far for each?
Sorry if I seem nit-picky, but "shadow of a doubt" isn't the standard.In the event a crime with a victim occurs, neither party deserves more justice than the other. True justice is impartial, dealing equally with all parties involved. The criminal's justice is the ability to face his accuser(s), the right to a fair trial, and innocence until proven guilty beyond the shadow of a doubt. In some cases, rehabilitation may be helpful, such as in cases of drug abuse (although I feel all narcotics should be legal), however, in cases of premeditated murder and rape, there is no argument for rehabilitation. These are people who should be confined from interacting with society. Justice for the victim varies case by case.
I feel our system does a fair job. Although, I haven't had any personal experience on either end, thankfully. All in all, excepting the fact that laws are sometimes weighted a little too much in the woman's favor in divorce cases and the like, our system does a good job of providing fair trials and such for the people.
Sorry if I seem nit-picky, but "shadow of a doubt" isn't the standard.
REASONABLE DOUBT is the standard. One might think that they are the same, they are not.
Just a pet peeve of mine.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?