Who shares the bulk of the blame for violent "protestors" at Trump events?

[Arjay81]

Hmmmm...I asked twice whether something was clear, once for you to explain further something you wrote, and once "calling for what?" in reference to when you wrote:



Because "that" could refer to either dismissal of relevant facts, or restriction of freedom of speech.

So the only "partisanship" on display is on the clarity vs obfuscation side. I've said exactly what I think and why. I've asked you to clarify what you mean, and you only respond with insults and rhetoric.



That's weird.



Plenty of people are capable of intellgibile and lucid replies. If I thought you weren't, I'd just stop replying.

Do you ever get tired of spinning so fast in an attempt to defend yourself? Spin any faster and you will screw yourself into the ground.

 

[ashurbanipal]

Do you ever get tired of spinning so fast in an attempt to defend yourself? Spin any faster and you will screw yourself into the ground.

No, I do not get tired of it, because I am not spinning. That previous sentence (i.e. the one that immediately precedes this one) is an example of answering a question. Even though that question is unfair (presumes something that is false), a direct answer still meets it. Perhaps you can go back and answer the questions I posed. This is, what? three or four posts of yours that have no substance, only name-calling. If you were correct in any of your accusations, you'd make substantive replies.

 

[Arjay81]

No, I do not get tired of it, because I am not spinning. That previous sentence (i.e. the one that immediately precedes this one) is an example of answering a question. Even though that question is unfair (presumes something that is false), a direct answer still meets it. Perhaps you can go back and answer the questions I posed. This is, what? three or four posts of yours that have no substance, only name-calling. If you were correct in any of your accusations, you'd make substantive replies.

Your first sentence merely prolongs a lie that you have convinced yourself is true (it isn't).

Since you seem to refuse to consider any thought other than your own, there is no point in continually pointing out your errors. Goodbye.

 

[ashurbanipal]

Your first sentence merely prolongs a lie that you have convinced yourself is true (it isn't).

Since you seem to refuse to consider any thought other than your own, there is no point in continually pointing out your errors. Goodbye.

Again, if any of that were the case, you'd be able to say why, not merely make claims and then run off spewing names and insults over your shoulder.

 

[Grim17]

Normally I would say the protesters themselves, but nothing is absolute, and in this case Trump is purposely taking advantage of mob mentality and feeding it.

I beg to differ...

Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right racist, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right anti-women, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right anti-muslim, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right homophobes, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right xenophobes, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have for years, falsely accused the Tea Party of being a violent and racist organization, but that has never resulted in them acting out violently in protest.

There is nobody to blame for the violent protests and rioting by leftists, then the leftist themselves and those who encourage them.

They are not little children, they are adults or soon to be adults who are 100% responsible for their own behavior... Didn't your parents ever teach you this?

 

[radcen]

I beg to differ...

Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right racist, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right anti-women, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right anti-muslim, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right homophobes, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have called those on the right xenophobes, but that has not caused rioting.
Liberals, Democrats, progressives, socialists and communists have for years, falsely accused the Tea Party of being a violent and racist organization, but that has never resulted in them acting out violently in protest.

There is nobody to blame for the violent protests and rioting by leftists, then the leftist themselves and those who encourage them.

They are not little children, they are adults or soon to be adults who are 100% responsible for their own behavior... Didn't your parents ever teach you this?

You contradict yourself. Which is it?

 

[Grim17]

You contradict yourself. Which is it?

No contradiction... The second line refers to both.

It's too bad you're one of those people who sees things differently.