The Real McCoy said:
It does make a difference because you yourself said God does not exist, thus making you a foolish denier with nothing to back up your claim. I can support evidence for mine, why can't you?
The only thing I have to back up my claim is common sense and science. The
more science progresses, the
less space your "immaterial" god occupies.
It isn't wishful thinking, it's history. Noteworthy examples include: North Korea, Cuba, the former Soviet Union and various other Godless communist nations.
Dude,
our nation wasn't founded on faith:
http://www.postfun.com/pfp/worbois.html
So, you can give a few examples.That
does not mean because they are "Godless" that they have problems. And the last time I checked, Communist China was in good shape.:lol:
How many nations wage war in the name of some "divine" entity? Your "god" just acts as an amplifying lever for the human desire for revenge. But what the hell does God do? Nada. If he loves us, why favor some and not others and vice-versa? If he is so powerful, why did he need pilots to take out buildings (9/11), and why didn't he save the innocents? Every army in the world went to war claiming "God" is with us. First the Muslims when they colonized Europe, the Christians did during the Crusades, the Inquisition, the wars between India and Pakistan, Cypress, Ireland, Kosovo, and finally Iraq. People are
always inflicting harm on one another in the name of some "God."
It certainly is stellar matter. Unfortunately, science does not explain it well, I'm very familiar with the discoveries in modern astronomy. The forming of a cloud, eerily and unmistakabley identical in appearance to a human eye, complete with the "glimmer in the pupil" that is the star from which the nebula formed cannot be explained, nor can the fact that the star is well off-center from where it should be to form such a structure. This evidence doesn't come from simply looking at a picture but rather, extensive scientific documentation.
It seems science dosen't question their explanantions at all. Where do you get off saying science cannot explain it? More Christian, Bible-thumping hearsay. The Hourglass Nebula is a tenous cloudof gas formed by a sun-like star undergoing "death tremours" at the endof its life. The star had difficulty in getting enough fuel to keep up its nuclear furnace,and has now shed off some of its surface material in 2 directions.
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMONLWO4HD_index_O.html
http://hourglass-nebula.iqnaut.net/
It sounds to me that science dosen't have any trouble explaining it at all.:lol:
Unlike calls to God, not everybody curses.
And not everybody "calls to god."
Numerous measurements all coincide and point to the universe originating approximately 14 billion years ago. These include the cosmic microwave radiation background, electromagnetic spectrographic observations of stars, galaxies and quasars and the galactic expansion rate, on both local and grander scales. There has been no substantial evidence to the contrary.
14 Billion years ago?
Prove it. The Big Bang theory says the universe is expanding, it might not be infinite, per sae, but it's so damn big beyond our comprehension.
http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/brunoiuw3.htm
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#RB
http://www.byteland.org/cosmology/infinity.html
http://everythingforever.com/ywexist.htm
You STILL DON'T get it. God CREATED the physical laws that govern our world and universe. He is NOT bound by them. You continue to put him into physical terms. You (or I or anybody for the matter) can't comprehend the nature of the realm God exists in. Most people accept this however you foolishly and stubbornly continue to try to claim that God must follow physical laws such as causality and gravity.
Well he
has to be created.
Nothing cannot exist from scratch. If it were, it wouldn't exist. Before you throw out these Bible-thumping 1 and 2 liners, provide some evidence.:lol:
You also failed to acknowledge 2 of my examples: "The beauty, complexity and ordered design of the universe, the earth, and life itself." and "The ability of our minds to logically reason, an impossible product of chaotic randomness." Don't waste your breath though, however you choose to respond will be flawed and I'll continue to point out the fallibility in your reasoning.
Ok, but how do thos examples
provide any evidence of a god? I think the design of the universe shows excellent proof of the big bang causing an explosion in space. And since our minds can logically reason, that
must be a gift from your "supernatural" god,right? Dude, that's just faith,behind perception. You have
no evidence whatsoever. You provide what you
think is evidence, but,on the contrary, it only proves my point.:lol:
I'm done arguing with you. I've wasted too much time and energy (in vain) listening and responding to your circular logic and outright mindless statements. People like you are a very small minority and with good reason.
Good. I've wasted way too much valuable time in vain trying to get through to you. You put too much stock in a book that was always written by ancient transcribers.
I do, however, have a rhetorical question for you: It's dangerous for someone to deny God, lest he actually exist but what danger is there in accepting that he does if he in fact does not exist?
I think it's dangerous for people to believe in an "almighty" god, well, act on their beliefs anyway. Think of all the damn time you're wasting if it turns out after death there is nothing. You live by all these damn rules and strict guidlines, and spend a good portion of your life attending worship services, worshipping a worthless piece of wood or metal for nothing? Think about all the fun you're giving up?